>>514847776
>13 pbtid
Cry moar, bot.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor increased cancer rates, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

>>514791619
The earth is round, but nukes aren’t real.

A useful heuristic, Anon’s Razor: the fakest and gayest answer is probably correct. Let’s see how it works

Flat Earth: this would be a big conspiracy, but if true would mean the oligarchy is MORE powerful AND more important than believed. This would be a big secret, and a real and straight secret. Anon’s Razor says: BULLSHIT.

Nukes are fake: this would be a big conspiracy, but if true would mean the oligarchy is LESS powerful AND less important than believed. This would be a big secret, but a lame and gay secret. Anon’s Razor says: LEGITIMATE.

Nukes are just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop oligarchs been abusing for millennia.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor increased cancer rates, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

Nukes are as real as the holocaust. Just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop they’ve been abusing for millennia.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor increased cancer rates, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

Fake and gay. Like nukes and the holocaust.

Just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop they’ve been abusing for millennia.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor increased cancer rates, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

The reality is you can’t weaponize atomic energy as it’s analogous to a low explosive, you would need nuclear confinement to generate a big boom. They tried for 80 years to create a real doomsday weapon (as they’re psychopaths) using every imaginable core shape and design, but they failed as it just isn’t possible, you can’t confine it long enough to make it go big-boom.

>>513967863
>we

>>513711117
Nukes are as real as the holocaust. Just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop they’ve been abusing for millennia.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor increased cancer rates, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

>>513701091
Nukes are fake and gay like all of politics. Just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop they’ve been abusing for millennia.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared. Likewise, Japan was under an authoritarian censorship regime after the war (CCD) that confiscated medical records of the victims and punished any discussion of the real damage from the (fire & chemical weapons) bombings.

You can’t weaponize atomic energy as it’s analogous to a low explosive, you would need nuclear confinement to generate a big boom. They tried for 80 years to create a real doomsday weapon (as they’re psychopaths) using every imaginable core shape and design, but they failed as it just isn’t possible, you can’t confine it long enough to make it go big-boom.

>>513621432
Nukes are fake and gay like all political theater.

Just another iteration of the “do as I say or the sun will stop rising” psyop they’ve been abusing for millennia.

Look at these shitty composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shopped-trained eyes it’s ridiculous.

Notice that neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki have elevated radiation levels, nor circular blast radius, in Hiroshima an unreinforced masonry building survived at “ground zero”, both had destruction indistinguishable from the other large scale fire bombings of the war like Dresden. Indeed, the extent of the destruction of the fire bombings was classified for decades after the war. Why? Because the nuke hoax wouldn’t have held if the destruction were compared.

You can’t weaponize atomic energy as it’s analogous to a low explosive, you would need nuclear confinement to generate a big boom. They tried for 80 years to create a real doomsday weapon (as they’re psychopaths) using every imaginable core shape and design, but they failed as it just isn’t possible, you can’t confine it long enough to make it go big-boom.

>>213759412
>

I think the first one was necessary, because Japan's rigid honour code meant they'd drag their whole country down rather than surrender, BUT if the enemy has some new ultra mega super weapon, well we have to surrender to save our babies from these monsters.

The second one wasn't necessary. I think they did it from a combination of vengeance, Japan dragging its feet on actually surrendering (three days is not a long time btw) and, well, they had another bomb just sitting there.

Here’s a laugh riot: boomers bought these shitty optical composites as photographic evidence of nukes

>>512351278
Flat earth is a well poisoning psyop to deflect from the obvious fake moon landings and other nasa frauds (ISS hairspray).

Nukes aren’t real tho, look at these shitty optical composites they tried to pass off as pictures of the bombings, they look so fucking laughable to our shop-trained eyes it’s ridiculous

How will /pol/ be celebrating the 80th anniversary of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (6th and 9th August, 2025) bombing which effectively ended WW2 and made the USA the global leader?

>>63965471
Zamn that’s crazy.

I'm a nuke denialist.
It just doesn't sound that plausible
>then what happened to those cities?
bombed the normal way, but they zoomed in for the photo

ITT: Things that weren't necessary