It makes a strong observation and is scathing, but draws a false conclusion in an attempt for a self loathing/hateful rhetoric towards people the author doesn't like (self improoover nofap types)

Even very basic logical thinking can debunk the chad kissing cheerleader image. Why would somebody who is the result of reproduction (you, the incel chud, etc.) suddenly be genetically unfit to reproduce in a single generation? That's not how evolution works. It would only be possible if you had an actual genetic disorder (like you were born with down syndrome, exposed to extremely toxic chemicals, crippled, etc) but the observation still stands that there is a large amount of disaffected young men who feel they never got a chance to "go with the flow". So therefore, what actually changed so much in a single generation to spawn the concept in the image? Was it the subject's genetics, or massive and unprecedented changes in society? It's very simple and easy to blame individuals instead of acknowledging this fact.

>>12415227
yes he did
https://dukenukem.fandom.com/wiki/Duke_Nukem_(character)

didnt we do that back in the cold war already

>>509234544
>So you believe that in the 80s people who had no jobs and just sat around bitching and feeling sorry for themselves all just had houses given to them somehow?
This is your problem, and it's why we know you are a Boomer. You characterize everyone that rightly has issues with modern home affordability as an unemployed layabout. Huge surprise, a big fat fucking loser that fell assfirst into comfort is doing his utmost to stop others from enjoying the same simple life he enjoyed.

>>509224047
Hey man, you're the one that said you would let a commie destroy America you fat faggot. This entire board just dresses up its plain desire for anarchy under anti-kike rhetoric. That's why your immediate response to me recognizing you for what you are is to accuse me of being a kike. You have literally nothing else at your disposal. It's what your response to this will be as well.