23 results for "b6f609654f1eea8f9f392102651c6b29"
>>519595289
>understood she's a kike
>endorsed her for public office anyway
>>519445335
Couldn't we say the same about you niggers making the threads?
>>519437256
>it's "shilling" when you reply to the threads we spam

So stop spamming threads and I won't have anywhere to post my replies lmao
>>519429996
>you're spamming by replying to the threads we spam
>>519342738
If you didn't think there were muslims on /pol/, why are you spamming "memes" specifically directed at muslims on here?
>>28666909
How do you increase your engine's RPM to match the next gear without using heel-toe?
>>515628105
Isn't Fuentes mocking people for not doing shit, while not doing shit?
So why did Crowder lie? Whats his angle?
>>515541434
How does that contradict his answer?
>>515040210
>the way to defeat the democrats is to elect the democrats
>>514950799
>more pro-Jewish than Laura "the literal zionist Jew" Loomer
>>514917025
>there's not enough deportations happening
>that's why we need to cut more funding from ICE
>>514721667
wtf I HATE Tucker Carlson now!
>>513914075
>I've been making these threads for a year but you're a shill for replying to them

So stop making the threads shillboy
>>28580935
>more efficient power wise, but not DBA wise

Muffling is just trading power for DBA suppression.
How can a muffler be more efficient power wise but NOT more efficient DBA wise? Wtf do you mean by "more efficient power wise"? More power per WHAT?
>>513588875
>shilling
>all of them
>"stop replying to all the threads we keep making shill!"
>>513362510
>a shill is someone who replies to spam threads, not the people spamming the spam threads

Pretty easy to stop my shilling then isn't it? Just stop spamming the threads and I won't have anywhere to post!
>>512744586
>but he can't tactically endorse Trump
>>512681900
>groidpers complaining about purity spiraling
>>512652305
>names the Jew
>endorses Laura "the zionist Jew" Loomer for public office
>>213049956
>pedophile doesn't tolerate pedophilia
So with the new 4.0 planetary logistics, I get a trade cost if my planet has negative output of materials, right? So I have to produce EVERYTHING on site? Or is it better to just eat the trade cost and dedicate one planet to just producing trade? is this every material like motes and gasses or just minerals and energy?
>>40532135
>I haven't seen that is it any good?
to discuss a /tv/ show, we would need to move this conversation there. I merely referenced public information to help explain my demand to Op, who claims to have special powers. Hence, my posts are in fact /x/ related and I cannot speak to the question you asked.