>>509897423
There have been many societies in the past where it was considered normal, acceptable behaviour for adults to have sexual relations with children and adolescents, including the pre-modern West:
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17743362

>It destroys social cohesion/trust and is ultimately bad for the future and growth of a society
Do you have any actual evidence for this claim?

>>509377985
So? Children engage in sexual activities with other children and adults in cultures all across the world. It used to be common in pre-modern Europe as well, before feminism.

You can read lots of examples in this thread here: https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17743362

>>509175991
>Because it fucks you up for life when u get molested
But many societies have allowed adults and children to enjoy sexual relations together, without any negative benefits. Just see pic rel.

And prominent psychologists themselves say that consensual adult-child sex is not causally linked with harm: >>509171328

>>40238885
Not an argument.

>>40238929
Trannies think it's okay for boys to take sex hormones and mutilate their penis, they believe that boys have the discretion to consent to this, but they think loving man/boy relationships are morally wrong/harmful, it's bizarre.

>>509103462
Yes, I'm extremely jealous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XTsrE0Lbtc

>>40227245
How is it bait? Many societies have practiced pederasty, and believed it to be beneficial.

>>508991041
Many societies in the past have believed that it had a social benefit, so it isn't unlikely that there is an evolutionary reason for its existence.

>>508911976
Only in a minority of societies which have practiced pederasty were the boys described as unwilling participants. In Rome, for example, the boys were often, although not always, slaves. The way sexuality has been expressed in different societies throughout history is radically different to today. Here is a thread about it on /his/:
https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/17743362

>>508777347
Pairing men and boys together as lovers strengthens the bond between them and creates an ideal pedagogical relationship. There have been countless societies that have practiced this form of relationship, including many great ones. Pederasty was common throughout Europe before the spread of Judeo-Christianity.

>>508777477
This is a fundamentally Jewish point of view.

>>508661717
Nobody was under the illusion that sacrificing or cannibalizing a victim was in their best interests, and people rarely participated voluntarily in these actions. Plenty of societies on the other hand believed pairing a boy with an adult lover (usually a younger man himself) was a good way to contribute to his development, and the boys were voluntary participants.

>>17768663
>It is somehow only petty when I point this out lol
It is, because it's a small, single, grammatical error. Not multiple spelling errors like you claim. I have not bothered to point out your many grammatical errors, because that would be petty.

>despite you calling me illiterate for zero reason.
You are either illiterate or dishonest because you can not parse and respond to a post or represent my argument properly.

>Either way any pervasive tradition of ritualized child rape would produce some sort of material tradition along side it
No, it wouldn't have.

>The cultural reinforcement necessary to make people okay with this most heinous of acts demands an extensive effort to normalize and it
There have been plenty of societies where pederasty was normalized, with much better documentation than the Celts, the vast majority of which did not view sexual relations between men and boys as heinous.

>All of these would produce much more material than their habits of humming.
You have not given me archeological evidence for the pervasive practices of having sex with women, hugging children, and humming, which the Celts would have engaged in. You claimed that every pervasive practice left archeological evidence.

>>17768669
That is not archeological evidence that Celtic men had sex with women. That is an assumption built on other evidence. For all we know, the archeological record is consistent with Celts using syringes to impregnate their women.