4chan Search
49 results for "d16ceb718b4133baff20b2188591baee"
>>520549561
I for on like tattoos. I sure don't want to have to waste my time getting to know someone to discover they're worthless. Tattoos save you all that time! I have never met a person with a tattoo that was worth my time.
I remember hitting it off with a girl and I started to like her but something wasn't right. Eventually I found out she had a foot tattoo - some dumb woman script - and stopped talking to her. It wasnt just the ink, there was something about her that didn't feel right. So a friend of a friend dated her a little later. She ended up using him and robbing him blind. Dude had to move back in with his parents. Tattoos = toilet human
I for on like tattoos. I sure don't want to have to waste my time getting to know someone to discover they're worthless. Tattoos save you all that time! I have never met a person with a tattoo that was worth my time.
I remember hitting it off with a girl and I started to like her but something wasn't right. Eventually I found out she had a foot tattoo - some dumb woman script - and stopped talking to her. It wasnt just the ink, there was something about her that didn't feel right. So a friend of a friend dated her a little later. She ended up using him and robbing him blind. Dude had to move back in with his parents. Tattoos = toilet human
>>520223254
women are easily brainwashed by mass media. major corporations could stand to lose hundreds of billions in profit if they don't pay off the media to consensus crack and psyop into women loving sex robots.
it wouldn't even take much. almost no women had tattoos before angelina jolie and a few other celebs were promoted for their tats. the celeb media made a big deal about celeb tats back then and suddenly women were all getting tats and now over half of millenial women have tattoos. even though its ugly and trashy looking and women before didnt want them
just pay taylor swift a few million to bonk a droid and women will fall in line
women are easily brainwashed by mass media. major corporations could stand to lose hundreds of billions in profit if they don't pay off the media to consensus crack and psyop into women loving sex robots.
it wouldn't even take much. almost no women had tattoos before angelina jolie and a few other celebs were promoted for their tats. the celeb media made a big deal about celeb tats back then and suddenly women were all getting tats and now over half of millenial women have tattoos. even though its ugly and trashy looking and women before didnt want them
just pay taylor swift a few million to bonk a droid and women will fall in line
>tattoo nigger lover
Sigh.
Sigh.
>>215382014
>does stupid shit because her stupid girl friends do stupid shit
I hate this the most. Women will let others tell them to do shit like pic related.
>does stupid shit because her stupid girl friends do stupid shit
I hate this the most. Women will let others tell them to do shit like pic related.
>>519143110
No lie man, last time I was in Seattle I saw a nigger on the bus who had stolen one of the huge rolls of toilet paper from a public restroom, it was a large as a manhole cover.
No lie man, last time I was in Seattle I saw a nigger on the bus who had stolen one of the huge rolls of toilet paper from a public restroom, it was a large as a manhole cover.
Democracy is suffering two big problems
> Representation
Representatives almost never actually represent a majority of their constituents interests, people vote for lesser evils, vote splitting, etc
> Participation
People don't fucking vote enough
Now the solution to the representation problem you've likely heard before: Ranked Choice Voting. You rank each of the candidates based on who you think would be the best leader relative to each other (who doesn't love making tier lists) and this is tabulated with everyone elses ranked choices so that the most palatable candidate to the most amount of people is elected. candidates now have to appeal to everyone instead of just their "base"
Now my solution to participation is actually a combination of Australia's mandatory voting system and various pay-to-vote programs. Every voting age adult has a $50 flat tax on their assessment for the tax year of an election but when they go to the polls and vote, they receive $100 cash. If turn out is 50%, the program is cost neutral, if turn out is low, it actually generates revenue, and if turn out is high, its only ever a fraction of political entity's budget since both budgets and the pay-to-vote expenditure is relative to population, but now the government has significantly more legitimacy. and if youre personally worried about the cost, you can not vote and let the treasury have your $50
> Representation
Representatives almost never actually represent a majority of their constituents interests, people vote for lesser evils, vote splitting, etc
> Participation
People don't fucking vote enough
Now the solution to the representation problem you've likely heard before: Ranked Choice Voting. You rank each of the candidates based on who you think would be the best leader relative to each other (who doesn't love making tier lists) and this is tabulated with everyone elses ranked choices so that the most palatable candidate to the most amount of people is elected. candidates now have to appeal to everyone instead of just their "base"
Now my solution to participation is actually a combination of Australia's mandatory voting system and various pay-to-vote programs. Every voting age adult has a $50 flat tax on their assessment for the tax year of an election but when they go to the polls and vote, they receive $100 cash. If turn out is 50%, the program is cost neutral, if turn out is low, it actually generates revenue, and if turn out is high, its only ever a fraction of political entity's budget since both budgets and the pay-to-vote expenditure is relative to population, but now the government has significantly more legitimacy. and if youre personally worried about the cost, you can not vote and let the treasury have your $50
>>150876084
Looks British tho.
>>150876112
Sadly
>>150876152
What nonsense
>>150876182
>>150876068
No idea about her private life, just bits and pieces you learn randomly, like the above ones (mostly because some priest forbidden by the church to offer service called her a monster because of the tattoos - later apologized when learnt about her devotion afair)
Motly it is the pic related
>>150876834
Not by faith. But maybe some of her ancestors converted or she was brought up as Christian to protect them against Germans by some nuns or something, as some Jewish orphans would sometimes be (which, amazingly, Jews hate - they'd rather those kids had been killed, I guess).
Anyhow, she looks Jewish a bit.
>>150876339
Grim
Looks British tho.
>>150876112
Sadly
>>150876152
What nonsense
>>150876182
>>150876068
No idea about her private life, just bits and pieces you learn randomly, like the above ones (mostly because some priest forbidden by the church to offer service called her a monster because of the tattoos - later apologized when learnt about her devotion afair)
Motly it is the pic related
>>150876834
Not by faith. But maybe some of her ancestors converted or she was brought up as Christian to protect them against Germans by some nuns or something, as some Jewish orphans would sometimes be (which, amazingly, Jews hate - they'd rather those kids had been killed, I guess).
Anyhow, she looks Jewish a bit.
>>150876339
Grim
Somebody should update this meme for schizo niggers
The tattoo purge is upon us
How do we get feminists to demand more female migrants and asylum seekers?
Those coming over are overwhelmingly male, which is sexist. Women need protection more than men do.
>but I don’t want any immigrants
They do, so make them argue for less destructive immigrants and restrictions on lone males.
I really feel like this could resonate with feminists, especially the man-hating variety that are politically active.
Those coming over are overwhelmingly male, which is sexist. Women need protection more than men do.
>but I don’t want any immigrants
They do, so make them argue for less destructive immigrants and restrictions on lone males.
I really feel like this could resonate with feminists, especially the man-hating variety that are politically active.
>>514230194
Also just ask them "What do you ACTUALLY do at your job?" and notice how most of them can't even explain what they do and they just veer of to some random story of what they did 8 month ago
Also just ask them "What do you ACTUALLY do at your job?" and notice how most of them can't even explain what they do and they just veer of to some random story of what they did 8 month ago
>>513853269
>Considered getting a tattoo
What the fuck is going on with roasties brains recently and their endless obsession with getting stupid fucking tattoo's
>Considered getting a tattoo
What the fuck is going on with roasties brains recently and their endless obsession with getting stupid fucking tattoo's
>>214082849
ale ona nie robi tego dla ciebie tylko dla SIEBIE, incelku czudzie!
ale ona nie robi tego dla ciebie tylko dla SIEBIE, incelku czudzie!
>>513637690
The State relies on them over men, they are naturally more docile, they are propagandized more easily, and they have been convinced that they are boss babes slaying the patriarchy.
They are also much better consoomers.
Older women and single mothers will adopt the State as a surrogate Father, providing gibs, alimony and rotection as long as they blame the knees and that men are the scapegoat for their woes.
That being said, they are more and more disillusioned, mentally unwell and are very bad at being state enforcers.
Such a system is doomed to fail, eventually.
The State relies on them over men, they are naturally more docile, they are propagandized more easily, and they have been convinced that they are boss babes slaying the patriarchy.
They are also much better consoomers.
Older women and single mothers will adopt the State as a surrogate Father, providing gibs, alimony and rotection as long as they blame the knees and that men are the scapegoat for their woes.
That being said, they are more and more disillusioned, mentally unwell and are very bad at being state enforcers.
Such a system is doomed to fail, eventually.
>>513608940
so tiresome
so tiresome
Because every western government fucking sucks and clearly hates it's people? Behind all the shaming and bluffing and bullshitting this system does need people willing to maintain it. The goal was that he (the brother in your picture) would maintain the system and then sustain parasites, not that he would be one. Anybody complaining about "welfare leeches" in the modern era just isn't a serious person considering corporate welfare is destroying fucking everything.
The system is rigged, why participate in it. Everything costs a million bucks, it's shit, the jobs suck, the economy is trash, there is no social fabric anymore and they're propagandized that everything is getting better when it obviously isn't and that obvious solutions are actually unworkable and wrong.
So? Fuck the system then they say.
The system is rigged, why participate in it. Everything costs a million bucks, it's shit, the jobs suck, the economy is trash, there is no social fabric anymore and they're propagandized that everything is getting better when it obviously isn't and that obvious solutions are actually unworkable and wrong.
So? Fuck the system then they say.
>>513594487
That's a good idea. I don't have such a system but it's generally the more ink the less value the person has. I feel like the older the person is the less it counts against them.
For example a 75 year old man with a marine deployment mark isn't the same as some faggot Starbucks barista with a sleeve of cartoon character.
It really has saved me. I was getting very serious with a girl and she had a tattoo on her foot. I had always said I wouldn't marry a girl with ink. It's just something personal to me that if you're willing to mark your body you're likely willing to do other shit I don't agree with. It didn't work out, not because of her tattoo but it was a war in. I got with my now wife of 14 years days after breaking up with foot tattoo girl, who finally got married at age 40 a couple years ago and has no kids. I have 3.
That's a good idea. I don't have such a system but it's generally the more ink the less value the person has. I feel like the older the person is the less it counts against them.
For example a 75 year old man with a marine deployment mark isn't the same as some faggot Starbucks barista with a sleeve of cartoon character.
It really has saved me. I was getting very serious with a girl and she had a tattoo on her foot. I had always said I wouldn't marry a girl with ink. It's just something personal to me that if you're willing to mark your body you're likely willing to do other shit I don't agree with. It didn't work out, not because of her tattoo but it was a war in. I got with my now wife of 14 years days after breaking up with foot tattoo girl, who finally got married at age 40 a couple years ago and has no kids. I have 3.
>>513525327
None. They're both fake and gay.
None. They're both fake and gay.
>>213943297
wyobraź sobie że gdzieś tam żyją takie turbo oskarki co mają takie problemy
wyobraź sobie że gdzieś tam żyją takie turbo oskarki co mają takie problemy
This whole screed is still in favor of the managerial state of anarco tyranny that the EU represents. Fuck the EU.
It hasn't brought prosperity to it's citizens or increased, much less safeguarded, the freedom of it's citizens. On both of these fronts it has actively decreased them.
Russia called them on their stupid larp and now they say "we have to fight for Europe!" what Europe you stupid fuck? The one you'll throw people into prison for saying they want to defend? People aren't motivated to fight for an economic zone, pretty much every fighting age male that isn't an illegal immigrant or refugee wants the EU to collapse so that something better can be built from the ruins.
PS: I just roll my eyes so much seeing people say shit like "Germany is getting an army now, watch out!" or "The UK might go into Ukraine!" please, your nations are being chopped up by people who hate you, wake the fuck up. And the UK's entire armed forces couldn't fill a stadium.
It hasn't brought prosperity to it's citizens or increased, much less safeguarded, the freedom of it's citizens. On both of these fronts it has actively decreased them.
Russia called them on their stupid larp and now they say "we have to fight for Europe!" what Europe you stupid fuck? The one you'll throw people into prison for saying they want to defend? People aren't motivated to fight for an economic zone, pretty much every fighting age male that isn't an illegal immigrant or refugee wants the EU to collapse so that something better can be built from the ruins.
PS: I just roll my eyes so much seeing people say shit like "Germany is getting an army now, watch out!" or "The UK might go into Ukraine!" please, your nations are being chopped up by people who hate you, wake the fuck up. And the UK's entire armed forces couldn't fill a stadium.
Obligitory
>>512647052
Is that Kenneth Lamar Noid? He thought the Noid ads were about him and took hostages in a Domino’s store in 1989.
Is that Kenneth Lamar Noid? He thought the Noid ads were about him and took hostages in a Domino’s store in 1989.
>>512513069
feminism
feminism
Who the hell are all those ppl paying for this shit
gfberg wants a tattoo so i told her my honest opinion and now shes in a mood
How to use 3 months
I have money for 3 months of rent, food and gym.
Maybe a few hundred euros on too of that.
What can I realistically invest in (tools, training, something else) that will allow me to survive after the 3 months?
Conditions:
-no working for a boss
-languages: English (native), Russian (native), Serbian (basic)
Maybe a few hundred euros on too of that.
What can I realistically invest in (tools, training, something else) that will allow me to survive after the 3 months?
Conditions:
-no working for a boss
-languages: English (native), Russian (native), Serbian (basic)
