>>213542589
I think the evidence for evolution is pretty weak and even convoluted but it does explain a lot about human behavior

>>213485812
This is the kind of simple low IQ reasoning that ends up being right 2bh

>>40785523
>You're the one with the questions, so I'm pointing you to the missing background. I can't give it to you on /x/. It takes years. Catholics start at age zero.
This is a cop out

>>40744266
What you say is inconsistent with mainstream Islam and you gave no example of what exactly i got wrong about the Trinity
You type for the sake of typing

Middle is how I see 95% of people who pretend to admire Thomas Aquinas

>>212527814
What if the counters are biased and reverse the facts and lies