4chan Search
29 results for "d8dd936765a28fc7ba3aab7f44da04eb"
How could he win?
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself.
How could he win?
Lmmp0j
How could he win?
>>18101475
Winter war vs other wars is a good example of how his lacks sentience. Taking large number of causalties is inevitable in any major war. Troops are the lumpen population that all dies of meth so they are all going to die anyway. All the car accidents and other deaths are like 1 million American casualties every decade. WW2 level losses already occur in peacetime at slightly lower frequency and over longer period of time.
The fact a small amount of territory was gained is also expected because reality isn't a video game where you move units to squares. The political control of territory is related to bureaucracy and the presence of competing influence so a strongly established country like Finland is going to last while a nothing country like Poland will just disappear.
Hence the vastly larger apparent territorial gains in different wars really means nothing because those places were slowly subverted by communists over decades against weak institutions whereas any established country is impossible to conquer.
Wars are calories per capita below 2000. Wars only happen in nations that are about to die anyway and the large casualty accounts are unavoidable and not reflective of any results. You can take millions of losses doing nothing and then zero losses subverting territory you've already built influence in and are just walking through to plant a flag.
His is a retard board so from the perspective of the users here everything happens in hoi4 where you click and tell a unit to go somewhere and the color changes. In reality taking over a territory is more dependent on no opposing force being there. For example, Americans failed to capture munich. America lost WW2 and Germany changed sides voluntarily without being annexed and conquered.
Winter war vs other wars is a good example of how his lacks sentience. Taking large number of causalties is inevitable in any major war. Troops are the lumpen population that all dies of meth so they are all going to die anyway. All the car accidents and other deaths are like 1 million American casualties every decade. WW2 level losses already occur in peacetime at slightly lower frequency and over longer period of time.
The fact a small amount of territory was gained is also expected because reality isn't a video game where you move units to squares. The political control of territory is related to bureaucracy and the presence of competing influence so a strongly established country like Finland is going to last while a nothing country like Poland will just disappear.
Hence the vastly larger apparent territorial gains in different wars really means nothing because those places were slowly subverted by communists over decades against weak institutions whereas any established country is impossible to conquer.
Wars are calories per capita below 2000. Wars only happen in nations that are about to die anyway and the large casualty accounts are unavoidable and not reflective of any results. You can take millions of losses doing nothing and then zero losses subverting territory you've already built influence in and are just walking through to plant a flag.
His is a retard board so from the perspective of the users here everything happens in hoi4 where you click and tell a unit to go somewhere and the color changes. In reality taking over a territory is more dependent on no opposing force being there. For example, Americans failed to capture munich. America lost WW2 and Germany changed sides voluntarily without being annexed and conquered.
How could he win?
How could he win?
Y
Let's have a survey of his of your general expectations of the future.
1. What time frame do you think can reasonably be predicted?
2. What are your predictions over that time?
3. Does it have anything to do with history?
4. Does his have a cohesive ideology?
5. Opinions on other predictions?
6. Does your opinion fit into spammed memes of his?
7. Opinion on ideologies here?
8. If possible, general demographic information age race location
9. Favorite thread types
10. Predictions of this board
Let's have a survey of his of your general expectations of the future.
1. What time frame do you think can reasonably be predicted?
2. What are your predictions over that time?
3. Does it have anything to do with history?
4. Does his have a cohesive ideology?
5. Opinions on other predictions?
6. Does your opinion fit into spammed memes of his?
7. Opinion on ideologies here?
8. If possible, general demographic information age race location
9. Favorite thread types
10. Predictions of this board
Additional jidf attempts.
Bulgarian qf guns
Gilf war
Vietnam
Pompey
Alexander auxiliary
Mohammed
Small ambushes
Bulgarian qf guns
Gilf war
Vietnam
Pompey
Alexander auxiliary
Mohammed
Small ambushes
>>18087778
>>18087783
Ww2 really is the most boring memed overdone war that exists which is why his spams it.
His fixates on death toll. The civilian death toll. The military death toll in WW2 as KIA on the Soviet side was five million. It wasn't a lot. WW1 had more. The taiping rebellion, Napoleonic and Russian civil wars each had 2/3 as many deaths. The number of deaths was not a lot more than other wars that his completely ignores.
The bomb volume dropped in ww2 was a lot less than Vietnam. The bomb volume was less and the air warfare was a lot less. The air to air warfare was limited to battle of Britain and Pacific which his ignores anyway. Eastern front was the worst for air warfare.
WW1 had many more artillery shells fired than WW2. Where the big discrepancy comes in is in tanks.
WW2 had only one large tank battle (Kursk). Because his doesn't discuss Kursk it actually doesn't discuss anything about WW2 at all. It just spams lend lease black cock American bullshit. Hitler spam. Random race spam.
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself.
WW2 just isn't an especially consequential war. No new countries and nothing new happened as a result of the war besides making the cold happen faster. It really had no effect on history. It is of interest just because it's an event his is aware of and his is too dumb to be aware of anything else. Even the size of the war wasn't a lot more than other wars that were more important.
There's no way for his to shut up about WW2 because it's video games and YouTube tards and whatever his watches all day focus on WW2 alone, and not even the interesting parts but just the leaders and bureaucracy, so WW2 spam will continue until mods finally delete this board to prevent your brain activity from falling so low your brain stops sending breathing signals.
>>18087783
Ww2 really is the most boring memed overdone war that exists which is why his spams it.
His fixates on death toll. The civilian death toll. The military death toll in WW2 as KIA on the Soviet side was five million. It wasn't a lot. WW1 had more. The taiping rebellion, Napoleonic and Russian civil wars each had 2/3 as many deaths. The number of deaths was not a lot more than other wars that his completely ignores.
The bomb volume dropped in ww2 was a lot less than Vietnam. The bomb volume was less and the air warfare was a lot less. The air to air warfare was limited to battle of Britain and Pacific which his ignores anyway. Eastern front was the worst for air warfare.
WW1 had many more artillery shells fired than WW2. Where the big discrepancy comes in is in tanks.
WW2 had only one large tank battle (Kursk). Because his doesn't discuss Kursk it actually doesn't discuss anything about WW2 at all. It just spams lend lease black cock American bullshit. Hitler spam. Random race spam.
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself.
WW2 just isn't an especially consequential war. No new countries and nothing new happened as a result of the war besides making the cold happen faster. It really had no effect on history. It is of interest just because it's an event his is aware of and his is too dumb to be aware of anything else. Even the size of the war wasn't a lot more than other wars that were more important.
There's no way for his to shut up about WW2 because it's video games and YouTube tards and whatever his watches all day focus on WW2 alone, and not even the interesting parts but just the leaders and bureaucracy, so WW2 spam will continue until mods finally delete this board to prevent your brain activity from falling so low your brain stops sending breathing signals.
Ww2 really is the most boring memed overdone war that exists which is why his spams it.
His fixates on death toll. The civilian death toll. The military death toll in WW2 as KIA on the Soviet side was five million. It wasn't a lot. WW1 had more. The taiping rebellion, Napoleonic and Russian civil wars each had 2/3 as many deaths. The number of deaths was not a lot more than other wars that his completely ignores.
The bomb volume dropped in ww2 was a lot less than Vietnam. The bomb volume was less and the air warfare was a lot less. The air to air warfare was limited to battle of Britain and Pacific which his ignores anyway. Eastern front was the worst for air warfare.
WW1 had many more artillery shells fired than WW2. Where the big discrepancy comes in is in tanks.
WW2 had only one large tank battle (Kursk). Because his doesn't discuss Kursk it actually doesn't discuss anything about WW2 at all. It just spams lend lease black cock American bullshit. Hitler spam. Random race spam.
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself.
WW2 just isn't an especially consequential war. No new countries and nothing new happened as a result of the war besides making the cold happen faster. It really had no effect on history. It is of interest just because it's an event his is aware of and his is too dumb to be aware of anything else. Even the size of the war wasn't a lot more than other wars that were more important.
There's no way for his to shut up about WW2 because it's video games and YouTube tards and whatever his watches all day focus on WW2 alone, and not even the interesting parts but just the leaders and bureaucracy, so WW2 spam will continue until mods finally delete this board to prevent your brain activity from falling so low your brain stops sending breathing signals.
His fixates on death toll. The civilian death toll. The military death toll in WW2 as KIA on the Soviet side was five million. It wasn't a lot. WW1 had more. The taiping rebellion, Napoleonic and Russian civil wars each had 2/3 as many deaths. The number of deaths was not a lot more than other wars that his completely ignores.
The bomb volume dropped in ww2 was a lot less than Vietnam. The bomb volume was less and the air warfare was a lot less. The air to air warfare was limited to battle of Britain and Pacific which his ignores anyway. Eastern front was the worst for air warfare.
WW1 had many more artillery shells fired than WW2. Where the big discrepancy comes in is in tanks.
WW2 had only one large tank battle (Kursk). Because his doesn't discuss Kursk it actually doesn't discuss anything about WW2 at all. It just spams lend lease black cock American bullshit. Hitler spam. Random race spam.
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself.
WW2 just isn't an especially consequential war. No new countries and nothing new happened as a result of the war besides making the cold happen faster. It really had no effect on history. It is of interest just because it's an event his is aware of and his is too dumb to be aware of anything else. Even the size of the war wasn't a lot more than other wars that were more important.
There's no way for his to shut up about WW2 because it's video games and YouTube tards and whatever his watches all day focus on WW2 alone, and not even the interesting parts but just the leaders and bureaucracy, so WW2 spam will continue until mods finally delete this board to prevent your brain activity from falling so low your brain stops sending breathing signals.
>>18087134
I don't understand why his takes pride in YouTube watching given its entirely popular history for retards and children.
I don't understand why his takes pride in YouTube watching given its entirely popular history for retards and children.
>>18085506
It was always shit, it got better now that 67% of users died of mass suicide.
It was always shit, it got better now that 67% of users died of mass suicide.
>>18083782
Nobody denied it before the 19th century. It's obvious Jews killed babies and nobody ever denied it, the denials came centuries later when Jews began to Jew harder.
It's impossible to explain what happened besides jews as it's completely impossible goy have a coordinated conspiracy for centuries to kill their babies.
Nobody denied it before the 19th century. It's obvious Jews killed babies and nobody ever denied it, the denials came centuries later when Jews began to Jew harder.
It's impossible to explain what happened besides jews as it's completely impossible goy have a coordinated conspiracy for centuries to kill their babies.
How could he win?
How could he win?
>>18079347
It never happened. Nazis took Moscow and then lied and said they didn't so the war would continue. Had Nazis declared they took Moscow the war would end there.
Instead they did nothing for two years and then surrendered. Hence illogical change of sides and momentum across the war.
Ultimately, the rotschilds are to blame for everything. America kept the Soviet bureaucracy alive and waited out the Nazis, who died of meth, and that ended the war.
It never happened. Nazis took Moscow and then lied and said they didn't so the war would continue. Had Nazis declared they took Moscow the war would end there.
Instead they did nothing for two years and then surrendered. Hence illogical change of sides and momentum across the war.
Ultimately, the rotschilds are to blame for everything. America kept the Soviet bureaucracy alive and waited out the Nazis, who died of meth, and that ended the war.
>>18078447
This is a stereotypical repetitive thread but here's the answers.
Shell production is what limits wars. Oil makes them happen faster. It doesn't change who wins.
Russia never actually produced oil. It's oil is fake and isn't used. Russia imported from Iran and America and it never had useful oil. Baku was already declining when the war happened and Russians fuel consumption was only about one oil tanker equivalent a month and came from a few pipelines to Iran plus American tankers.
The oil production at the time was so small that whaling or any other minor sources would have decided the issue and even the Nazis technically had enough oil. America produced 3mbpd. If 10% is real and 10% of that was needed by Germany then even Germany domestic production at the end of the war covered most of their needs.
Most oil is condensate or tar. Ghawar is all the real oil and in the past Bradford field, the Ohio and East Texas fields were the main sources as well as Iran. Until 1980s Iran was producing light oil and afterward tar. In WW2 Germany did have some real oil production and romania did also.
It really did not matter what happened to Baku as it wasn't a real source. Obviously if oil was necessary and it was in Baku it would matter. In reality not only is shell supply the issue but also america was supplying Russia with oil and Germany would just lose faster if it had more ability to expend shells.
This is a stereotypical repetitive thread but here's the answers.
Shell production is what limits wars. Oil makes them happen faster. It doesn't change who wins.
Russia never actually produced oil. It's oil is fake and isn't used. Russia imported from Iran and America and it never had useful oil. Baku was already declining when the war happened and Russians fuel consumption was only about one oil tanker equivalent a month and came from a few pipelines to Iran plus American tankers.
The oil production at the time was so small that whaling or any other minor sources would have decided the issue and even the Nazis technically had enough oil. America produced 3mbpd. If 10% is real and 10% of that was needed by Germany then even Germany domestic production at the end of the war covered most of their needs.
Most oil is condensate or tar. Ghawar is all the real oil and in the past Bradford field, the Ohio and East Texas fields were the main sources as well as Iran. Until 1980s Iran was producing light oil and afterward tar. In WW2 Germany did have some real oil production and romania did also.
It really did not matter what happened to Baku as it wasn't a real source. Obviously if oil was necessary and it was in Baku it would matter. In reality not only is shell supply the issue but also america was supplying Russia with oil and Germany would just lose faster if it had more ability to expend shells.
How could he win?
>>18077603
They actually didn't. The wehrmact completely surrendered in 1943 and it wasn't even there. In Poland most of the forces withdrew immediately.
All Thompson guns sent under lend lease went to Nazi partisans. America propped up the partisans that did all the war crimes and all three sides supported them.
It took until 1942 for the wehrmact to even get into Russia and it's primary war crime was Leningrad (obviously) and then stalingrad where Romania did everything.
Afterwards all the war crimes were by partisans and the wehrmact assisted them to some extent but for the most part Nazis weren't even present.
America failed to capture Munich and the reason for low rate of allied war crimes is their forces were very small, lost, and were confined to bases. In 1947 Hamburg rioted and the occupation was useless and allies didn't have anyone available to do anything.
They actually didn't. The wehrmact completely surrendered in 1943 and it wasn't even there. In Poland most of the forces withdrew immediately.
All Thompson guns sent under lend lease went to Nazi partisans. America propped up the partisans that did all the war crimes and all three sides supported them.
It took until 1942 for the wehrmact to even get into Russia and it's primary war crime was Leningrad (obviously) and then stalingrad where Romania did everything.
Afterwards all the war crimes were by partisans and the wehrmact assisted them to some extent but for the most part Nazis weren't even present.
America failed to capture Munich and the reason for low rate of allied war crimes is their forces were very small, lost, and were confined to bases. In 1947 Hamburg rioted and the occupation was useless and allies didn't have anyone available to do anything.
>>18076477
It lengthened WW2 because it prevented collapse of military industrial complex but it also had no military effect. America never bombed a power plant. It never bombed tank factories and the aircraft factories it bombed were easy to disperse and the best Nazi aircraft were made in France.
The concept of strategic bombing means nothing because the vast majority of manufacturing is extremely small scale and bombing the major projects the enemy is wasting time on isn't worthwhile. The b17s were incapable of hitting trains and also synfuel was a scam. What it bombed had no value.
Tactical level bombing of ground forces was done sometimes and had some effect but the strategic campaign mostly killed civilians (not that they cared, they died of meth anyway) and was just a excuse to dump bombs.
The main impact of the air campaign was for American airpower to be btfo against the interceptors, air defense and flak. Even though the losses from flak were low the flak damaged a large amount of aircraft and the bombing was costly up to end of the war.
>>18076486
It lengthened WW2 because it prevented collapse of military industrial complex but it also had no military effect. America never bombed a power plant. It never bombed tank factories and the aircraft factories it bombed were easy to disperse and the best Nazi aircraft were made in France.
The concept of strategic bombing means nothing because the vast majority of manufacturing is extremely small scale and bombing the major projects the enemy is wasting time on isn't worthwhile. The b17s were incapable of hitting trains and also synfuel was a scam. What it bombed had no value.
Tactical level bombing of ground forces was done sometimes and had some effect but the strategic campaign mostly killed civilians (not that they cared, they died of meth anyway) and was just a excuse to dump bombs.
The main impact of the air campaign was for American airpower to be btfo against the interceptors, air defense and flak. Even though the losses from flak were low the flak damaged a large amount of aircraft and the bombing was costly up to end of the war.
>>18076486
>>18073192
Because the rotschilds organized wars but also WW1 was artificially prolonged by England and France refusing to agree to peace during their early losing position, and afterwards the German high command destroying itself on orders from the rotschilds.
In WW2 France just supported the Nazis and there was no border, the border was returned when the allies let Nazis achieve their initial war goal of retaking the war and agreed to peace.
Before then Germany didnt exist and medieval Germany was a smattering of disconnected states and the question means nothing.
Because the rotschilds organized wars but also WW1 was artificially prolonged by England and France refusing to agree to peace during their early losing position, and afterwards the German high command destroying itself on orders from the rotschilds.
In WW2 France just supported the Nazis and there was no border, the border was returned when the allies let Nazis achieve their initial war goal of retaking the war and agreed to peace.
Before then Germany didnt exist and medieval Germany was a smattering of disconnected states and the question means nothing.
>>18068025
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself. Even without the invasion, Japan could have built the planned battleships it wanted and actually used them and defeated America at sea.
America got as far as it did because Japan let them win, didn't use its battleships, and didnt use the cannon on the zeroes.
If Japan tried then America would lose because england was helping Japan and in the long term they had China to lean on. America won because Japan didn't use its resources.
Wikipedia had a edit war to hide Yamato sinking itself. Even without the invasion, Japan could have built the planned battleships it wanted and actually used them and defeated America at sea.
America got as far as it did because Japan let them win, didn't use its battleships, and didnt use the cannon on the zeroes.
If Japan tried then America would lose because england was helping Japan and in the long term they had China to lean on. America won because Japan didn't use its resources.
>>18068710
>>18068712
My great grandfather did fight in WW2.
He was bullied by other soldiers and pushed off a ledge in France. He got a purple heart.
That sums my family experience in WW2. More experience in other wars.
>>18068712
My great grandfather did fight in WW2.
He was bullied by other soldiers and pushed off a ledge in France. He got a purple heart.
That sums my family experience in WW2. More experience in other wars.
How could he win?
How did he win?