>>82759054
In actuality the reasons for the way the internet is are quite different that what you think. Social atomisation occoured because of personalized social media feeds, which were created by companies to make users addicted to their platforms and get more ad revenue out of them, which made people only see what they wanted, and only want what they saw. This made people more unique than they realised but also more secluded than ever, as they now had nobody to share their "uniqueness" with, with certain exceptions of course. This was clearly an unplanned consequence for the rich since now they have a mental health and fertility epidemic on their hands instead of productive workers, but they won't just give up their profits for this, so they're trying all sorts of ways to cirmcumvent it, like immigration, outsourcing and AI, all of which have more drawbacks than not, which they'll realise in due time.
People by default segregate to their own kind, but they're almost all their own people, so they're alone. Of course this isn't as prevailent yet, since the majority of the population predates such social media, but it is what we're converging into.
>The internet went the way of the modern metropolis.
I'd rather say the modern metropolis went the way of the internet, as social media shaped peoples knowledge of the world, they grew distant and unrelateable to each other.