>>511248744
>The one who "didn't knew" did so of their full will and desire to submit, they would rather die than ever admit they where stupid.
>No amount of proof will ever convince those who weren't convinced from the beginning.
>No amount of proof will force big pharma's accomplice (politician, "expert", journalist, etc) to actually find anything bad to say on big pharma.
Literally what do you do about this? Do you need to make critical thinking and speaking up on issues more culturally acceptable? Does it need to be taught to children before a certain age before people's thinking becomes 'fixed'? Is it actually genetic. I've been amazed at people's ability to contradict reality since I was young and it just keeps happening. There must be a way, some process, to make people open their eyes and be honest with themselves, and others. It's like the Goebbels quote, you can try to get someone to realise something but the next day they do literally reset.