>>716333002
>Atlus superiority

>>716235741
If turn-based is so perfect, then why do the games severely underperform?

>>532361335

>>716204547
That study and sales figures prove that younger generations have no interest in boomer gaming concepts like turn-cringe combat. Square Enix had to learn that the hard way.

>>715950834
Since when do turn fags buy turn-based games?

Not to mention that Square Enix still does make turn-based games. Yes, the ones that you don't buy.

>>715643723
>THIS IS THE POWER OF TURN SLOP!
>ARE YOU IMPRESSED SQUARE ENIX?
kek

>>715585987
>w-why ddidn't Square Enix c-cater to the niche turn-nigger a-audience!!!!???`
Because you don't buy turn-based games. You don't even buy turn-based Final Fantasy games, which is why Lightning Returns flopped.

Also, nobody ever asked for 1:1 remake. If you want the same fucking game, then just replay Final Fantasy VII.

>>715540403
>overrated turn-cringe slop
ftfy