>>24490458
>orphism
That's the best video I can offer for you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KG2TBst3PG0

>>24486254

>>24476268
Regarding physical appearance

>>24473708
>If he supposes that a thing is different from its name, then surely he's mentioning two things.

if you say, "a tree is not the same as the word 'tree'", you are now talking about two things:

The word 'tree' (the sign)

The actual tree (the referent)

acknowledging the difference between a name and the thing it names necessarily means we are speaking of two distinct entities: the name, which is a symbol, and the thing, which exists independently of the name. This distinction preserves the link between language and reality, allowing words to meaningfully refer beyond themselves

>>24469624

>>24466932
>You claimed that Dawkins argument comes down to "God himself needs a creator"

God is not a created creator.

>>24463040
The Bible

>>24461128