Search Results
7/23/2025, 11:07:50 PM
7/22/2025, 3:46:17 AM
7/20/2025, 10:22:16 AM
>>510868962
do you by chance also have a newsletter i could subscribe to?
do you by chance also have a newsletter i could subscribe to?
7/18/2025, 5:55:43 AM
>>212839524
You're thinking of Pom. Get your hapas strait anon.
You're thinking of Pom. Get your hapas strait anon.
7/17/2025, 10:55:26 PM
>>510654492
>Stephen King
>rumored to be on the list
>hates Trump
>vehemently agrees with him on this issue
Yeaaaaa. Theres a tape of him porking a drugged up minor, isn't there?
>Stephen King
>rumored to be on the list
>hates Trump
>vehemently agrees with him on this issue
Yeaaaaa. Theres a tape of him porking a drugged up minor, isn't there?
ID: QbYNHLw1/biz/60635331#60645462
7/17/2025, 9:49:53 PM
7/17/2025, 7:57:27 AM
7/16/2025, 8:10:38 AM
>>96102125
I reject your assessment and persist in my false reality.
I reject your assessment and persist in my false reality.
7/11/2025, 9:54:33 PM
7/11/2025, 9:27:20 PM
>>24540324
>Casanova seduces his bastard daughter without even knowing about their relation and even proposes to her
>Her mother stops them and tell them the truth
>His response is to have a threesome with the two of them
>Casanova seduces his bastard daughter without even knowing about their relation and even proposes to her
>Her mother stops them and tell them the truth
>His response is to have a threesome with the two of them
7/8/2025, 9:31:08 AM
7/1/2025, 11:12:38 PM
>>509250768
just have to word the order to get rid of it differently.
that`s what it always seems to come down to.
just have to word the order to get rid of it differently.
that`s what it always seems to come down to.
7/1/2025, 6:05:24 PM
7/1/2025, 1:25:41 PM
6/30/2025, 1:52:14 AM
6/28/2025, 9:31:31 PM
>>18109319
Votes say Tony so your right there isn't a debate you can cry and complain about it but no one's going to care
facts are facts
Votes say Tony so your right there isn't a debate you can cry and complain about it but no one's going to care
facts are facts
6/24/2025, 3:45:25 PM
>>713519014
do gacha fans really think about cuckoldry when they see a guy in their game? pretty wild
do gacha fans really think about cuckoldry when they see a guy in their game? pretty wild
6/24/2025, 2:07:54 PM
>>212067719
yes but finish "pendejo" with an "s" to make it plural
I almost forgot but also in other context can mean "young person" like "zoomer" in english
but be careful because it is vulgar language in both cases, you don't want to sound like a rude boy
>>212067794
>noted
yes but finish "pendejo" with an "s" to make it plural
I almost forgot but also in other context can mean "young person" like "zoomer" in english
but be careful because it is vulgar language in both cases, you don't want to sound like a rude boy
>>212067794
>noted
6/21/2025, 1:02:23 PM
>realize that Ironjar aromatics are super easy to get and are really good for recluse because of the increased poise
>take some for Adel thinking it'll help with staying alive while reviving allies
>end up getting oneshot by his huge lightning Shockwave
>wtf.jpg
>look on fextra to see how much damage negation Ironjar even gives
>+20% physical neg -60%(SIXTY FUCKING PERCENT) lightning
>take some for Adel thinking it'll help with staying alive while reviving allies
>end up getting oneshot by his huge lightning Shockwave
>wtf.jpg
>look on fextra to see how much damage negation Ironjar even gives
>+20% physical neg -60%(SIXTY FUCKING PERCENT) lightning
6/20/2025, 10:17:37 PM
>>211748752
>Because the movie has received plenty of criticism from actual Indians about how their culture was depicted, sometimes inaccurately
So, just because people from the culture being represented complain about how a film represented them, that means it's an inaccurate portrayal?
Do you really think it's that simple, though?
I mean, think about it. What if conservative rural americans complained that society at the time and place Brokeback Mountain is set in was not as homophobic as the film makes it out to be, that it's propaganda designed to make rural americans look more backwards that they are - or alternatively, that homosexuality didn't exist in society at the time - then this wouldn't necessarily mean the film is inaccurate, would it?
If someone made a movie in modern China, where China was depicted as an oppressive, totalitarian regime, and chinese people complained, would that make it an inaccurate movie?
If someone made a movie in modern Russia and Ukraine during the war, where Russian soldiers are shown behaving in a brutal way towards the peoply the occupy, and russian people complained, would that make it an inaccurate movie?
I think you get my point. I don't know exactly what those complaints are that you mentioned coming from indians towards that movie, and I'd be interested in knowing what you consider those inaccuracies to be. But if my guess is correct, it probably has to do with how much the movie focuses on the extreme poverty in India. And that, I'm afraid to say, is for the most part an accurate portrayal. It's changing, and I have no doubt indians will eventually rise out of poverty like everyone else did, but it's a reality for the time being, even more so back then. In that sense, Brokeback Mountain is actually a more accurate representation of India than 90% of Bollywood movies out there. Which should probably dispell any idea that someone from a specific culture is necessarily more apt at representing that culture accurately.
>Because the movie has received plenty of criticism from actual Indians about how their culture was depicted, sometimes inaccurately
So, just because people from the culture being represented complain about how a film represented them, that means it's an inaccurate portrayal?
Do you really think it's that simple, though?
I mean, think about it. What if conservative rural americans complained that society at the time and place Brokeback Mountain is set in was not as homophobic as the film makes it out to be, that it's propaganda designed to make rural americans look more backwards that they are - or alternatively, that homosexuality didn't exist in society at the time - then this wouldn't necessarily mean the film is inaccurate, would it?
If someone made a movie in modern China, where China was depicted as an oppressive, totalitarian regime, and chinese people complained, would that make it an inaccurate movie?
If someone made a movie in modern Russia and Ukraine during the war, where Russian soldiers are shown behaving in a brutal way towards the peoply the occupy, and russian people complained, would that make it an inaccurate movie?
I think you get my point. I don't know exactly what those complaints are that you mentioned coming from indians towards that movie, and I'd be interested in knowing what you consider those inaccuracies to be. But if my guess is correct, it probably has to do with how much the movie focuses on the extreme poverty in India. And that, I'm afraid to say, is for the most part an accurate portrayal. It's changing, and I have no doubt indians will eventually rise out of poverty like everyone else did, but it's a reality for the time being, even more so back then. In that sense, Brokeback Mountain is actually a more accurate representation of India than 90% of Bollywood movies out there. Which should probably dispell any idea that someone from a specific culture is necessarily more apt at representing that culture accurately.
6/18/2025, 1:45:33 PM
>>507846587
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Comprehensive_Strategic_Partnership.pdf
Article 3, point 3.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/06/Comprehensive_Strategic_Partnership.pdf
Article 3, point 3.
6/18/2025, 1:24:10 AM
6/17/2025, 6:58:27 AM
6/15/2025, 6:24:26 PM
>>507483949
>Yank America
Quebec
>Spic America
Haiti
>Western Europe
Belgium probably
>Eastern Europe & Western Asia
T**key
>Eastern Asia
Hard to say
>India
Where do I even begin
>Arabia & North Africa
Israel obviously
>Subsaharan Africa
Somalia probably
>Yank America
Quebec
>Spic America
Haiti
>Western Europe
Belgium probably
>Eastern Europe & Western Asia
T**key
>Eastern Asia
Hard to say
>India
Where do I even begin
>Arabia & North Africa
Israel obviously
>Subsaharan Africa
Somalia probably
6/15/2025, 4:39:03 PM
6/15/2025, 6:37:25 AM
6/14/2025, 2:32:58 PM
>>95863765
Session prep is separate from campaign prep. I aim to spend ~10 mins prep per expected hour of play.
>How do you prep your sessions and campaigns?
1 random encounter ready per expected hour of play. ~1-2 mins per encounter. Find creatures, create a map arrangement, write key notes for them. Lots of time is cut here as you can just port unused encounters from last week, taking effectively 0 seconds.
Review previous session notes. Mark ~3 key moments and expand them into session's potential plot hooks. Most typical key notes are "did X thing with NPC" as NPCs are easy through lines between sessions.
If I'm doing battlemaps, that takes up a lot of the remaining time. Beyond that, slap together some three line NPCs (Name + What they want + What they fear.) more or less NPCs depending on how populated an area the party is in / is expected to be.
Wrap up prep by overlaying the plans onto the trajectory of the campaign / the setting.
I do basically no campaign prep anymore as I have several campaigns that I've run several times already, ready to go. And little-to-no session prep needed if the party is going a direction I've already seen a party go.
Session prep is separate from campaign prep. I aim to spend ~10 mins prep per expected hour of play.
>How do you prep your sessions and campaigns?
1 random encounter ready per expected hour of play. ~1-2 mins per encounter. Find creatures, create a map arrangement, write key notes for them. Lots of time is cut here as you can just port unused encounters from last week, taking effectively 0 seconds.
Review previous session notes. Mark ~3 key moments and expand them into session's potential plot hooks. Most typical key notes are "did X thing with NPC" as NPCs are easy through lines between sessions.
If I'm doing battlemaps, that takes up a lot of the remaining time. Beyond that, slap together some three line NPCs (Name + What they want + What they fear.) more or less NPCs depending on how populated an area the party is in / is expected to be.
Wrap up prep by overlaying the plans onto the trajectory of the campaign / the setting.
I do basically no campaign prep anymore as I have several campaigns that I've run several times already, ready to go. And little-to-no session prep needed if the party is going a direction I've already seen a party go.
6/14/2025, 4:47:28 AM
>>17762621
>When all the children of Noah were spread across the climates, kingdoms, and strange habitations of the world — after the general division of tongues made at the founding of the Tower of Babel — in those days, which were called the Golden Age, men were as firm and enduring as mountains, and as rough and unrefined as stones and beasts. They magnified their great courage, boasting and displaying their mighty desires
>Then, the Enemy of mankind maliciously persuaded them to begin building towns, cities, and castles, to create scepters and diadems, and to forge and invent the cursed sect of the gods
>Among the possessors of the Isle of Crete, there was a rich man, full of greed, fortunate in adventurous enterprises, and greatly enriched by the grace of Fortune. Some called this man Celion, and others Uranus. He was the lawful son of Aether, who was the son of Demogorgon, the ancient dweller of the caves of Arcadia, and the first inventor of the false gods of the pagans
>This Uranus took as his wife his own sister, called Vesta. He lived gloriously with her and possessed the greatest part of the Isle of Crete, thriving in worldly goods and increasing his natural desires: first, by expanding and enlarging his worldly lordship and power, and second, by multiplying his lineage. He was marvelously rich
>He had two sons — namely, Titan and Saturn — and two daughters, one called Cybele, and the other Ceres, of whom mention will be made later. He also had many other sons and daughters, of whom I make no mention here, for the sake of brevity
Celion comes from Caelus, the Roman version of Uranus. According to Cicero and Hyginus, Caelus was the son of Aether and Dies, and reports that according to the "so called theologians" Aether was the father of one of the "three Jupiters". In the art of the Roman era, Caelus was often conflated with the primordial cycle/zodiac god Aion, who in his turn was also confused with Phanes, who was also the son of Aether.
>When all the children of Noah were spread across the climates, kingdoms, and strange habitations of the world — after the general division of tongues made at the founding of the Tower of Babel — in those days, which were called the Golden Age, men were as firm and enduring as mountains, and as rough and unrefined as stones and beasts. They magnified their great courage, boasting and displaying their mighty desires
>Then, the Enemy of mankind maliciously persuaded them to begin building towns, cities, and castles, to create scepters and diadems, and to forge and invent the cursed sect of the gods
>Among the possessors of the Isle of Crete, there was a rich man, full of greed, fortunate in adventurous enterprises, and greatly enriched by the grace of Fortune. Some called this man Celion, and others Uranus. He was the lawful son of Aether, who was the son of Demogorgon, the ancient dweller of the caves of Arcadia, and the first inventor of the false gods of the pagans
>This Uranus took as his wife his own sister, called Vesta. He lived gloriously with her and possessed the greatest part of the Isle of Crete, thriving in worldly goods and increasing his natural desires: first, by expanding and enlarging his worldly lordship and power, and second, by multiplying his lineage. He was marvelously rich
>He had two sons — namely, Titan and Saturn — and two daughters, one called Cybele, and the other Ceres, of whom mention will be made later. He also had many other sons and daughters, of whom I make no mention here, for the sake of brevity
Celion comes from Caelus, the Roman version of Uranus. According to Cicero and Hyginus, Caelus was the son of Aether and Dies, and reports that according to the "so called theologians" Aether was the father of one of the "three Jupiters". In the art of the Roman era, Caelus was often conflated with the primordial cycle/zodiac god Aion, who in his turn was also confused with Phanes, who was also the son of Aether.
6/14/2025, 1:52:35 AM
>>211708833
They are the fastest-growing economy in LatAm so they're both a threat to us and a possible model to follow for our eventual independence. It's confusing. Maybe if we had the Antillean Confederation there would be no problem.
They are the fastest-growing economy in LatAm so they're both a threat to us and a possible model to follow for our eventual independence. It's confusing. Maybe if we had the Antillean Confederation there would be no problem.
6/14/2025, 1:30:29 AM
Page 1