>>520181933
>than the entirety of the Second World War for the USSR.
it lasted six years not matter what they claim. vatnik unions joined ww2 with the molotov-ribbentrop pact (1939). When they joined the germans in starting the war together. they try to memory hole this fact hard and playing into their delusion of 41-45 is just tacitly aiding their propaganda
4chan Search
15 results for "0126bbd3714f5be2c39b4f7b59c6922d"
>USSR
>siding with a violently anti-Communist far-right military junta
Why are they like this?
>siding with a violently anti-Communist far-right military junta
Why are they like this?
>>215458687
>"allies"
>include vatnik union
>that started the war together with the germans
>with communists that were even more deranged then national socialists
this is your brain on reddit
>"allies"
>include vatnik union
>that started the war together with the germans
>with communists that were even more deranged then national socialists
this is your brain on reddit
>>64436733
>If the Soviets started WW2
they did though. they started it together with the germans by jointly invading east europe. Even had a official paper about, the molotov-ribbentrop pact. This fact has just been memory holed since it goes against the mystified version of WW2 that has been boiled down to black and white, world creation mythos. Angles vs demons etc. No, western countries would never side with germans over soviets in the war under any circumstance, even if the former would not have pissed off UK with pointless terror bombing
Same reason that today west countries are extremely reluctant to fully commit to the destruction of vatnikstan: its physically far away from them. While german imperialism was a immediate threat right next to them. So their own skin was on the line.
If that were not the case instead of the half-assed WW2 everybody ended up with there was only one morally clear path from UK/US perspective. Don't interfere with massive bail outs, let Hitler kill Stalin and then focus on gunning down the germans once they were overstretched and bled out. War drags on for a couple more years, ends sometime in 1948 with Europe fully liberated from the imperialists that started it all. Japan was going to be a solo project of US more or less anyway due to geographic position. And their fate was sealed with Midway
>If the Soviets started WW2
they did though. they started it together with the germans by jointly invading east europe. Even had a official paper about, the molotov-ribbentrop pact. This fact has just been memory holed since it goes against the mystified version of WW2 that has been boiled down to black and white, world creation mythos. Angles vs demons etc. No, western countries would never side with germans over soviets in the war under any circumstance, even if the former would not have pissed off UK with pointless terror bombing
Same reason that today west countries are extremely reluctant to fully commit to the destruction of vatnikstan: its physically far away from them. While german imperialism was a immediate threat right next to them. So their own skin was on the line.
If that were not the case instead of the half-assed WW2 everybody ended up with there was only one morally clear path from UK/US perspective. Don't interfere with massive bail outs, let Hitler kill Stalin and then focus on gunning down the germans once they were overstretched and bled out. War drags on for a couple more years, ends sometime in 1948 with Europe fully liberated from the imperialists that started it all. Japan was going to be a solo project of US more or less anyway due to geographic position. And their fate was sealed with Midway
>>64203970
in the molotov-ribbentrop alliance era germans and vatniks would be shilling in unison. then the great shill wars would begin in 41
in the molotov-ribbentrop alliance era germans and vatniks would be shilling in unison. then the great shill wars would begin in 41
>>64203970
in the molotov-ribbentrop alliance era germans and vatniks would be shilling in unison. then the great shill wars would begin in 41
in the molotov-ribbentrop alliance era germans and vatniks would be shilling in unison. then the great shill wars would begin in 41
>>214088407
>>resisting nazism is le bad
Didn't say or imply that. OUN/UPA fought against both. Nazism and communism are but different flavors of the same totalitarianism.
>>resisting nazism is le bad
Didn't say or imply that. OUN/UPA fought against both. Nazism and communism are but different flavors of the same totalitarianism.
>>513324611
The plan was to form another line after Wisła on the Bug and the Romanian Bridgehead, but the Soviet invasion on 17 September made it impossible and shortened the invasion by at least a month for Germany.
The plan was to form another line after Wisła on the Bug and the Romanian Bridgehead, but the Soviet invasion on 17 September made it impossible and shortened the invasion by at least a month for Germany.
>Allied is too a loud word. Molotov-Ribbentrop was a reaction to the Munich agreement.
Let the cope begin
Let the cope begin
>>510747138
They sure did kill a lot of white folks.
They sure did kill a lot of white folks.
>>510747138
They sure did kill a lot of white folks.
They sure did kill a lot of white folks.
>>509795979
Imagine this but with polish and german troops instead of soviets
Imagine this but with polish and german troops instead of soviets
>>17775955
You mean like when Hitler let the Soviets annex eastern Poland in their joint military operation?
You mean like when Hitler let the Soviets annex eastern Poland in their joint military operation?