Anonymous
9/5/2025, 1:13:44 AM
No.24698398
>[T]he Critique of Pure Reason [...] can never become popular, and, indeed, has no occasion to be so...
Anonymous
8/19/2025, 1:38:39 AM
No.24649349
Why haven't you read it yet? No excuses.
Anonymous
8/5/2025, 3:12:21 AM
No.24611421
I haven't read Kant in a while :(
Anonymous
7/7/2025, 1:03:26 AM
No.24527644
>>24527602
>our criticism is the necessary preparation for a thoroughly scientific system of metaphysics, which must perform its task entirely a priori, to the complete satisfaction of speculative reason, and must, therefore, be treated, not popularly, but scholastically. In carrying out the plan which the Critique prescribes, that is, in the future system of metaphysics, we must have recourse to the strict method of the celebrated Wolf, the greatest of all dogmatic philosophers.
He didn't kill metaphysics, he made it scientific.
Anonymous
6/14/2025, 12:43:48 PM
No.24465382
We know nothing more than our own mode of perceiving them, which is peculiar to us, and which, though not of necessity pertaining to every animated being, is so to the whole human race. With this alone we have to do. Space and time are the pure forms thereof; sensation the matter. The former alone can we cognize à priori, that is, antecedent to all actual perception; and for this reason such cognition is called pure intuition. The latter is that in our cognition which is called cognition à posteriori, that is, empirical intuition. The former appertain absolutely and necessarily to our sensibility, of whatsoever kind our sensations may be; the latter may be of very diversified character.
Anonymous
6/13/2025, 2:19:57 AM
No.24462501
>though all our knowledge begins with experience, it by no means follows, that all arises out of experience.
