>>214610170
notice how I haven't mentioned or even implied such things as "utopia" and "no conflict" in that or any other post I made. So then, is your problem one of illiteracy, delusion or are you simply pretending to be mentally deficient?
>>529551452 >wrong that game was liquid shit
The only bad thing about the game was the the writing for when you hang out in the Abbey.
The gameplay is some of the absolute best turn based combat in the last 10 years. Just from a pure design perspective it's very well designed and made by people that understand the issues and strengths with turn based combat.
>>713676950
Does he think no one ever tried to evade debt by having a relative "own" their property/business before and he's kinda genius to think of that?