>Beam me up, Data.
;_;

>>213043916
For me, it's Patrick Stewart. He's not even a sci-fi fan.

>>212977268
>>212977575
And how would you know that? Do you obsessively stalk them on Twitter or something? Because that would be far, far worse. You have no self-awareness whatsoever.
>Patrick Stewart
He doesn't care for sci-fi. That presumably includes Star Trek.

>>212945380
This is what seething about a commercial entertainment franchise does to your brain.

>>212375476
so fandom really is black and white to you? that doesn't sound healthy. it's also not an attitude shared by people that actually appeared on star trek

>>212337356
The intellectual property: 'Star Trek' is owned by Paramount Global (d/b/a Paramount). An American multinational mass media and entertainment conglomerate controlled by National Amusements and headquartered at One Astor Plaza in Times Square, Midtown Manhattan. Paramount Global (or whichever megacorp that might own Star Trek in the future) is the one who gets decide what is REAL Trek or not. And ONLY them. It is an insultingly entitled attituded if you think you can disagree with them. There's no room for debate or personal opinion. They're the boss of Star Trek. They decide. Your job as a Star Trek fan is to follow and support them.