>>508624062
>They live in a world where "social constructs" matter, because they can't accept that they don't, and the universal adoption of 4chanesque style of influence is an emergent phenomena derived from the internet structure and design interacting with humans.
i generally agree but i think you're leaving out the role of intelligence agencies on these sociocultural engineering efforts
IMO it's a mistake to see 4chan as grassroots viral meme-uprising instead of a deliberately cultured petri dish designed to appear organic
>>508624347
but what if we're just useful idiots riding the coattails of a glowing neo-mindwar strategy?
>>508624448
idk about you but my mind has gotten pretty fucked in the process though. abyss staring right back through me, infecting me, now i'm part of it and it's part of me. ("blackpilled" "redpilled" etc)
>>508624845
good point. and the shills originate from several different places and push different points of view.
>>508625366
all that shit was heavily glowing as well. first monitored but often directly being run by the spooks. the german hacking scene that assange was part of in particular. read the cuckoos nest by clifford stoll or the hacker underground by bruce sterling. some of the hacker types took their LARP seriously and got killed for it, getting found in burned out cars in the german countryside etc.
>>508625470
>4chan: nobody here but us ghosts
>>508627009
i have been thinkign about this recently. if the AI is trained on 4chan and let loose on the internet in a Dead Internet/Dark Forest type scenario, where most social media posts are actually bots/sockpuppets, then anons shitposting might have had an outsized influence on the tenor of online discourse and shape of social engineering
(I'm not just talking about ChatGPT, Grok, Claude or Gemini, I mean the real ones as well, the ones the gov't is running behind closed doors, Cambridge Analytica level and above, spook AI shit, probably running on BTC mining rigs)
