>>511429611
>wasn't the admin of this place outed as some lazy incel chud tranny leftist that walks his dog?
Yes, that's called "subversion", same paybook wall street used after the occupy wall street protests scared them shitless.
>MAN THE FUCK UP
This really is propaganda of the lowest order. "Being a man" used to mean pride, self respect, independence, taking bullshit from nobody, being armed and capable of self defense - essentially, the values of nobility. In the US, this was the archetype of the cowboy (a figure for whom it was in no way unapt to compare to a samurai - a literal nobleman - in works like Seven Samurai, itself a remake of the Magnificent Seven) despite the surface level incongruity, the former being an agricultural worker and the latter a de jure nobleman. Notably, only samurai could carry swords and of course the six shooter is synonymous exclusively with the cowboy, whereas the subservient do not carry weapons.
Today, "being a man" means the opposite - taking any amount of shit from you boss, reducing your living standards (even to the point of a tent outside an Amazon warehouse), total obedience to authority - the "values" of a broken slave.
>if you are not going to take the job then someone else will: Jamal, Muhammad, Tyrone, you name name it.
You've got it backwards - companies want to import replacements precisely because the don't want to afford fellow citizens (who still have self respect, demand workers' rights, etc.) their due.
>This is your social contract and it went unbroken for centuries.
The "social contract" has become a buzzword totally divorced from the original meaning. Coined by Hobbes, the "social contract" was the idea that a ruler provided law and order, defense, etc. (something modern states increasingly do not provide, especially in the face of mass migration) in exchange for the surrendering of certain rights by the people. Today, people like you use it to mean an obligation of citizens to slave away for corporations.
