Gensokyo is a spook.

And still, despite all of the meaning, the constructs, the divine right, and most of all, the one faggot using a bot to copy&paste spam his ready-made Uncle Adolf bullshit, all it took was picrel to rip it all to shreds for eternity, so much so that even Karl Marx ended up being as pissed as every rightoid faggot ever could be.

>Literally who

Read, nigger.

>>216379021
only for statistical purposes when applying for jobs
IDGAF about ethnicity or race generally speaking, it doesn't affect me personally and i gain nothing from identifying with it

How do egoists get away with calling everything "spooks" when things like biological sex and race can be proven through material, scientific means?

*pickes up 3 boxes and leaves without paying*

>>723440386
Lunatea... is a spook.

>>515453740
Freedom is a spook
Communism is a spook
I will keep shoplifting from walmart

>Bro, you gotta stop believing in the family and the nation and the church because they're all spooks, and you can't believe in spooks!!1!
What if I want to believe in spooks? What if it is the sovereign will of my Ego to be spooked and thoroughly enjoy the comfort these spooks provide me? As an egoist, how could Stirner respond to my genuine, authentic desire to be spooked?

After all this time, why has no one been able to debunk his arguments?
Whenever I see a Stirner thread, I see lots of knee-jerk replies and stupid insults aimed at OP.
Something along the lines of:
>I was an edgy brat too. Then I turned 14.
I really wonder why those reactions are so common.
Personally, I am deeply inspired by Stirner's thoughts on morality, liberalism, freedom, and the ego.
I just feel like some people here feel threatened by the strength of Stirner's arguments and are afraid of their beliefs/spooks collapsing. Am I wrong?
Im being dead serious, so Id appreciate serious answers to my question.

>>717878064
Sounds about right

Or is he still the reigning champion of philosophy?

The smartest move is to use the corporations and governments in different situations to feed my ego and use them as my personal property.
They both serve different uses to me, so I will use them where I see fit.
>But what about muh poor developers
Spook
>But what about muh social good
Spook

I will use them the ways I see fit.

>>713941513
It should be up to me and me alone if a game is to be played. What is for the good of others or other opinions on it are spooks. It should be my choice if I choose to play the game again today, tomorrow, 10, 20, 30, 100 years later or never. It is my choice on what I do with what is mine, because I choose to have it as mine and the interference of outside forces shall not infringe upon that
>Communist
lmao marx wrote more about his refutation of The Ego and It's Own than did for his actual ideology.

Engels and Marx cried like a little bitch when he found out his little ideas were merely spooks of the mind and made up a cope argument against one of the greatest philosophers who ever lived.

>>105735741
Yes.

They are spooks of the mind.

They are merely arbitrary categories which have no basis in reality.