>>81720679
lgbt culture is just an extension of reddit culture, only lame faggots need all these depersonalized "communities"
why is it good that the majority should rule? I (individual) am special because I AM ME and THEY ARE NOT ME, and so it's best if the whole world panders to me!
>this is not how humans evolved
we didn't evolve to live past 40 just look at how an aging body trashes you
how can you expect an individual to care about the continuation of a species that any such individual won't even live to see?
you are such a faggot of a woman, that you care more about the species than the individual... the only "value" that women provide is in continuing and urthering the species, tying down individual men to families for the benefit of the species. so no wonder you think this way.
>destroy the definition of marriage
i don't care if it's just called a "civil union" when fags do it, if such "civil unions" have the same tax benefits as marriages and such. fags should be able to make that decision though of course individual churches can choose whether or not they want to ordain such a thing in their houses of worship.
but about "destroying the definition", what actual functional definition does it make if fags get a "civil union" vs if fags get "marriage"? what difference does that make in the society you care so much about? Can't you just use a different term to capture what you want to say, like "traditional marriage" such that a fag marriage becomes a "non-traditional marriage" instead? why is that bad?
