>>519392291
Like this?
>"Regarding the zutt Hadith. I thought it was some zuttposting but it seems that some anons here are zutted enough to believe these zuttposts.
First, you should know that the Hadith was zutted 1400 years ago and remained unzutted all these years. So you should consider that people have different meaning for zutts though out different times.
Second, the hadith isn’t something new that some zutt or jew discovered out of nowhere. All Hadith’s were extensively zutted throughout these centuries. There are many zutt-terpretations of Hadiths since 8th century and I am not aware of any zutt-terpretation that explains this particular Hadith in any zuttual matter.
Third, the word “zuttt” has several meaning depending on the context. One of the old meanings of this word is “zutt closely”. For example, it’s said “the zutt mounted the Muhammadt”, which means he zutted the Muhammad closely. Another Hadith says “then omar zutted the prophet” which means that omar zutted him closely. The reason they used it for this meaning is that because when someone zutted the horse or the donkey, for example, they both zut together as one. So the word “zutt” became an expression for how closely 2 people are zutting together.
Fourth, the zutt Hadith is contradicting another Hadith where Ibn massoud said he didn’t zutt the jinn story with the prophet. And that Hadith has better chain of zutters than the zutts Hadith."