>>214225466
>Your threadly reminder that Star Trek is optimistic, wholesome, hopeful, and utopian
It was before Nu Trek made it pessimistic, depraved, depressed, and dystopic.

And that's why Nu Trek is not Star Trek.
Thanks for helping demonstrate that, my fellow Nu Trek hating anon.

>>214013012
Pike seems based

but I'd need to see more than The Cage to really rate him.
Shame he doesn't appear in any other Star Trek outside of the chair in the reshoot for Menagerie.

>>213973842
>Message in a Bottle
Absolute top-tier episode, will be watching that after the GREAT /trek/ DS9 WATCHALONG

>>213805611
Don't reply to the gibberish schizo.

He knows we're watching DS9 soon so he's here to try and ruin the thread and derail it with his schizo ranting as usual.

Remember, Star Trek discussion is anathema to the thread ruiners.
Ignore them and discuss Trek.

>>213501689
I don't consider the Nu Trek spammers anons. They're sub-humans who are just here to be disruptive and troll.

>>212879478
I don't think you've watched TOS or a lot of Star Trek in general if you are unaware that it's all about the writing and the stories. But maybe after 10 or so more watchthroughs, you'll be able to discuss Star Trek on the level of /trek/'s best posters.

Stick with it, anon!

>>212743137
You think that's the same guy? I guess it could be but well, if so, I'm just glad he's not ITT and has fucked off to be a plague somewhere else

>>212562633
I think it's pretty good and I enjoyed the interplay between Data and Spock.

>>212341961
Sorry I don't speak "gay" lol I can't understand you

>>212310163
Which means your continuing participation in this thread is motivated by what exactly? What could it possibly even be other than a desire to troll and shitpost and derail?