>>725300959
They just keep comin' too, like infinite reinforcements.
4chan Search
14 results for "93735d0fe39ba74fad460dd56dce717c"
>>724018254
It's important. The reason is actually easy to understand. Fire Emblem has enemy phase combat in which you can consistently retaliate at full power, so it's better to retaliate on as many enemies as possible to cut down on wasted actions cleaning up stragglers in future turns. Since 99% of enemies attack from 1 range or 2, a weapon that retaliates on 99% of enemies is obviously very powerful if you can get it to consistently kill. Doesn't matter if only 10 out of 40 enemies attack with 1-2 or 2-range - that's 25% of enemies you don't have to think about on player phase.
This has always been important in every game, but it's become even more salient in more modern games, where you often suffer penalties by entering combat and failing to one-round the enemy. See: Conquest, Engage.
It's important. The reason is actually easy to understand. Fire Emblem has enemy phase combat in which you can consistently retaliate at full power, so it's better to retaliate on as many enemies as possible to cut down on wasted actions cleaning up stragglers in future turns. Since 99% of enemies attack from 1 range or 2, a weapon that retaliates on 99% of enemies is obviously very powerful if you can get it to consistently kill. Doesn't matter if only 10 out of 40 enemies attack with 1-2 or 2-range - that's 25% of enemies you don't have to think about on player phase.
This has always been important in every game, but it's become even more salient in more modern games, where you often suffer penalties by entering combat and failing to one-round the enemy. See: Conquest, Engage.
>>723414452
It's the best evidence that IS only cared about Conquest, and used the excuse that Birthright is "the easy one" to fill it with castoff maps. It's an earlygame map in scale (literally Conquest 9, with the front and sides cut off), so it's too small to populate it with real enemies. Their solution was to tack on an infinite-spawn gimmick to make you think they didn't copy Conquest's homework and then retard it up.
Revelation got this treatment the worst of the three routes.
It's the best evidence that IS only cared about Conquest, and used the excuse that Birthright is "the easy one" to fill it with castoff maps. It's an earlygame map in scale (literally Conquest 9, with the front and sides cut off), so it's too small to populate it with real enemies. Their solution was to tack on an infinite-spawn gimmick to make you think they didn't copy Conquest's homework and then retard it up.
Revelation got this treatment the worst of the three routes.
>>539208352
thats not very reassuring
thats not very reassuring
We're almost there, 5 minutes!
>Direct confirmed for Friday
>>717316552
> it's imposed on you as much as casual and normal mode are imposed on you. Choosing not to play on Casual is as much of a decision as committing to ignoring the turnwheel for the game.
You do realize Alear literally cannot die thanks to rewind, right? When Alear reaches 0 HP, the game will forcibly load up a rewind charge. At that point you either have to a) use it or b) reload the map.
It quite literally is unavoidable. You WILL encounter it at some point, against your volition. It's just a question of how you decide to handle it at that point. It's actually NOT just a menu option, because the game is COMPELLING you to load a do-over charge when the MC croaks.
> it's imposed on you as much as casual and normal mode are imposed on you. Choosing not to play on Casual is as much of a decision as committing to ignoring the turnwheel for the game.
You do realize Alear literally cannot die thanks to rewind, right? When Alear reaches 0 HP, the game will forcibly load up a rewind charge. At that point you either have to a) use it or b) reload the map.
It quite literally is unavoidable. You WILL encounter it at some point, against your volition. It's just a question of how you decide to handle it at that point. It's actually NOT just a menu option, because the game is COMPELLING you to load a do-over charge when the MC croaks.
>>716455014
>Anna is not even offensively better than Framme until the 20s
Lol what. She has better magic at 10/1. I guess she's a little slower, but it feels duplicitous to collapse that into "not better than Framme until the 20s", especially when speed fixes exist in Solm and you should obviously just give your MK Lyn anyway.
It's also completely fucking ridiculous to talk about her bulk. All the mages have shitty bulk and depend on Bonded Shield to do anything. Not the biggest Anna fan but the derangement surrounding her is weird to me to this day.
>Anna is not even offensively better than Framme until the 20s
Lol what. She has better magic at 10/1. I guess she's a little slower, but it feels duplicitous to collapse that into "not better than Framme until the 20s", especially when speed fixes exist in Solm and you should obviously just give your MK Lyn anyway.
It's also completely fucking ridiculous to talk about her bulk. All the mages have shitty bulk and depend on Bonded Shield to do anything. Not the biggest Anna fan but the derangement surrounding her is weird to me to this day.
Why are people ignoring Fimbulvetr? We can't jump straight to Ragnarok without first going through that.
>>2013492
I don't get it.
I don't get it.