>>214560892
E se vc engravidar?

>Scientist discovers life
>"I will call it... Adam..."

In collaboration with ChatGPT I researched which genres result in the most reproductive success, both of the people who make it and the people who listen to it, here are the results

1. Hip-Hop/Rap, 5 stars, Sexually dominant, high-fertility artists & fans

2. Country, 3 Stars, Strong family values, moderate-high fertility

3. Classic Rock, 3 stars, Historically strong, declining now

4. Pop, 2 stars, Flashy, sexy — but artists often don’t have many kids

5. Indie/Alt, 1 stars, Appeals to low-fertility elites

6. Classical/Jazz, 1 star, High status, low reproduction

Final Insight

If you’re looking at music not as art, but as an evolutionary fitness signal, then:

Hip-hop/rap is the most reproductively successful genre in modern Western society.

It glorifies the traits that evolution rewards: confidence, dominance, sexual availability, and actual reproduction.
Meanwhile, genres that appeal to the cerebral, sensitive, or disciplined — traits we culturally admire — often fail to reproduce, literally.

>>76468735
Please elaborate
>>76468866
You van fill each and every day with novel experiences to slow your perception of time. If you fall into a cycle doing the same things every day for a year, your brain will compress that whole year down to a single day and time will fly and you will be old in what feels like a matter of days.
>>76468904
Get better sleep
>>76469934
Sorry it's terminal
>>76471011
That's gross get it removed
>>76472010
Try resting and see if it goes away if it doesn't then that sucks
>>76472936
Dr. Pepe was busy in the lab
>>76473118
Rest

>>81869810
I heard this argument all the time in Brazil by our own indigenous people.
My ancestors came to Brazil in the 20th century from yurop. I think it's only fair I exercise my genetic right to immigrate to other countries as well.

vilka diagnoser har ni?

>>509219906
>You should just read my other posts since I'm not going to argue this all over again with another person.
I read your other posts and what I said stands.

You just rambled off on some bullshit, most of which is barely comprehensible for a non-schizo.
Very few things you said made any sense.

You asked for "a featherscale" and an "in between" here >>509207174 and I gave a direct response with proof here >>509216432
Then you asked for "proof" even though I already gave it to you.
So here is the PROOF :
>The Wikipedia article for "Feather" has an entire multi-part section on the evolution of feathers :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feather#Evolution
>Here's an entire presentation by the Cornell Lab Ornithology on how feathers evolved :
https://academy.allaboutbirds.org/features/all-about-feathers/feathers-through-time.php
>Article + TEDx video on the evolution
>Article :
https://www.schooltube.com/the-evolution-of-feathers-from-dinosaurs-to-birds/
>Video :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPLgfGX1I5Y
>Full blown in-depth scientific study on the evolution of feathers :
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0517

So go ahead.
Look at the proof and get back to me, with your arguments, reservations of whatever bullshit you want to spin.
I'll wait.

just ordered some edibles

HONEST THOUGHTS ON IRAN AND ISRAEL? NO THE CURRENT POLITICAL STUFF (IF YOU WANT TO THIS CUSS THIS, GO TO /POL/ O ALGO!), I MEAN THE OTHER STUFF, Y'KNOW. KEEP IT ON TOPIC.

Good info. I will peer review this tomorrow