Search Results
7/26/2025, 8:05:04 AM
>>213101242
Yes.
Yes.
7/3/2025, 9:59:36 PM
>>212309510
I'm never more proud of /trek/ than when it embraces Star Trek's principles and stands up to tyranny.
>>212309599
>softly admitting to participation
You are not very intelligent thankfully.
I'm never more proud of /trek/ than when it embraces Star Trek's principles and stands up to tyranny.
>>212309599
>softly admitting to participation
You are not very intelligent thankfully.
6/30/2025, 12:37:46 AM
>>212162206
Beyond that, it's forcing Star Trek to be something that is conducive to their retarded grimdark modern political stories.
>forcing the Fox News style broadcast into Picard
>yeah we just let all of the Romulans die and didn't even send humanitarian aid LOL
>the "Romulan Star Empire" which was large enough to maintain a massive "neutral zone" border with the Federation is now suddenly a planet with a single world which was obliterated by a single supernova
Nu Trek writers try to drag Trek's enlightened setting down into the mire of what's going on in our actual world instead of letting it be a beacon of optimism by which we might chart our way to the future.
It's just cheap, bad writing, similar to how a lot of comic book authors just have no idea how to write a Superman story and try to subvert his lore and make him edgy.
These are people who can't even conceive of the type of future Roddenberry was envisioning and should keep their hands off of it.
Beyond that, it's forcing Star Trek to be something that is conducive to their retarded grimdark modern political stories.
>forcing the Fox News style broadcast into Picard
>yeah we just let all of the Romulans die and didn't even send humanitarian aid LOL
>the "Romulan Star Empire" which was large enough to maintain a massive "neutral zone" border with the Federation is now suddenly a planet with a single world which was obliterated by a single supernova
Nu Trek writers try to drag Trek's enlightened setting down into the mire of what's going on in our actual world instead of letting it be a beacon of optimism by which we might chart our way to the future.
It's just cheap, bad writing, similar to how a lot of comic book authors just have no idea how to write a Superman story and try to subvert his lore and make him edgy.
These are people who can't even conceive of the type of future Roddenberry was envisioning and should keep their hands off of it.
6/26/2025, 7:21:40 PM
>>212014619
Thank you, anon. There's too much dishonest posting going around these days so it's genuinely appreciated.
Thank you, anon. There's too much dishonest posting going around these days so it's genuinely appreciated.
6/20/2025, 5:24:54 PM
Don't mind him. He's just "EU hours contentious argument" anon. He lives for starting very hostile arguments over very irrelevant topics.
He's not so bad once you realize it's a gimmick.
He's not so bad once you realize it's a gimmick.
6/18/2025, 5:47:03 AM
Thank God this guy's night time meds always kick in around this time
It's almost over, boys. Hold the line.
It's almost over, boys. Hold the line.
6/16/2025, 1:04:18 AM
>>211511353
Don't worry, they're good, quality Star Trek episodes that are a RETURN TO FORM for the storytelling of the series
Such as: the Klingon Musical episode!
Don't worry, they're good, quality Star Trek episodes that are a RETURN TO FORM for the storytelling of the series
Such as: the Klingon Musical episode!
6/14/2025, 6:06:24 PM
>>211450547
>ENT poster
>coomposting
Daily reminder ENT fucking sucks and it's proven out by the fact that no one ever discusses anything about any of the episodes -- they just post softcore porn.
>ENT poster
>coomposting
Daily reminder ENT fucking sucks and it's proven out by the fact that no one ever discusses anything about any of the episodes -- they just post softcore porn.
Page 1