Search Results
7/21/2025, 8:23:20 PM
7/17/2025, 8:34:15 PM
7/16/2025, 8:39:59 PM
7/15/2025, 7:02:04 PM
>>531337363
you and me both.
you and me both.
7/13/2025, 2:44:09 PM
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/11/2025, 12:29:15 AM
>>530737838
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
>Wow the CD quality is ludicriously higher than what I've been watching on YouTube.
Not only that, but [sound] above uses a compressed version of it, but it's also opus at 128kb so it's more or less the same.
7/10/2025, 7:21:38 PM
>>530701006
that actually the reason? pretty cool
that actually the reason? pretty cool
7/9/2025, 8:00:35 PM
>>530572557
Pleasure. I wonder how that [whatever] thinks about the surge of westoid fans in his comments.
Pleasure. I wonder how that [whatever] thinks about the surge of westoid fans in his comments.
7/8/2025, 11:09:18 PM
>>530466097
*gets banned*
*is still stuck in 720p hell with dog shit AA*
It's the one thing blue archive has over us, their PC port. Menus and everything are obviously still worse, but the general quality is higher as it's not bogged down by Jap coding bullshit.
*gets banned*
*is still stuck in 720p hell with dog shit AA*
It's the one thing blue archive has over us, their PC port. Menus and everything are obviously still worse, but the general quality is higher as it's not bogged down by Jap coding bullshit.
7/8/2025, 7:30:26 PM
>>530442917
Didn't expected to see something English, so thanks a lot!
>Feel free to enjoy it, newbros.
Gonna watch this in a hot minute, can only be better than the shit show I just watched.
>>530442973
Now that you say it, yeah, sadly very true. That thing is what, on it's 7th fucking season now? Insane run when ya think about it, doubt it's gonna stop anytime soon either.
Didn't expected to see something English, so thanks a lot!
>Feel free to enjoy it, newbros.
Gonna watch this in a hot minute, can only be better than the shit show I just watched.
>>530442973
Now that you say it, yeah, sadly very true. That thing is what, on it's 7th fucking season now? Insane run when ya think about it, doubt it's gonna stop anytime soon either.
7/7/2025, 8:47:16 PM
>>530316849
Running was and is still fun. My endurance is still in the shitter, but I ran a little further while keeping the roughly the same time.
>>530319292
I got that image too. I even printed it out and put it on my nightstand. I ran Conndor during work and commute and I didnt wanna check it so. I winged her more or less. I should keep more attention to it.
Running was and is still fun. My endurance is still in the shitter, but I ran a little further while keeping the roughly the same time.
>>530319292
I got that image too. I even printed it out and put it on my nightstand. I ran Conndor during work and commute and I didnt wanna check it so. I winged her more or less. I should keep more attention to it.
Page 1