>>40818545
>I am malebrained
yeah no, the "ironic" mean girls gifs are not malebrained. The "well that wasn't very woke of you" in regards to people saying you should get raped is not malebrained, and most of all the extreme attention seeking is not malebrained.
t. expert

>>40774364
NTA but

>>40654549
I literally actually do not know. Like I'm not an expert on CWC to begin with but I don't think so. It goes beyond even the most like, most cringe and fetishy trans people I've seen. This is catastrophic levels of autism that I don't know if we can truly say how real or fake any facet of their internal identity is. Don't even know if she went on hormones. Most people who are not transgender become pretty miserable on hormones and just from what I've heard I don't see CWC as someone who would live with their dick getting nuked. So that could be one metric I guess if we wanted to try and determine it.

I think most for most of us it makes us pause the HSTS or AGP shitflinging on whose "really" transgender because this one makes us stop and think like what the actual fuck is going on. If CWC is actually on hormones we just have to accept life is more absurd than ever thought possible.

>>40616472
the terf viewpoint, assuming the terf is a feminist (somehow I have seen several times women calling themselves terfs and later saying they're not feminists) is that trans women only transition for fetishistic reasons and are inherently misogynistic by committing "womanface" when trying to appear female. Or that we do it to try and prey on lesbians, or if attracted to men that we transition out of some relation to homophobia
Naturally this precludes acknowledging gender dysphoria so they usually come up with a variety of different reasons why trans men transition, usually related to misogyny and assigning them a lack of agency, saying they're too stupid/traumatized to know better than to go on T

Of course there's variance in this but I would say this is the pretty common belief among leftist/feminist types who form communities around being anti-trans. They're usually not willing to engage with anything or anyone that deviates from their prebaked perception of us, so it's pretty useless trying to have an actual discussion with them if you're a trans woman or trans man. They still lurk our board to discharge some verbal vitriol when they have a chance though.

>>40607952
>trans women as a minority population are oppressors (nevermind trans men, do not bring them up except to infantalize them and say they are too stupid or traumatized to have agency as full people)
>>40608384
>I'm a leftist and believe in social justice

Funny how left-right solidarity only occurs to shit on us it seems. Oh and jews I guess, I guess we're the two "no really this minority group is actually oppressing us all and they need to be segregated from the wider society that (((they))) are infiltrating"
Like does it not give you pause even a little bit to think on who you're rubbing elbows with in terms of politics?

I know about Glegle and I am gainfully employed

>>40467036
No bullshit but I'm pretty sure the same enzyme issue found in a lot of autistic people is also found in trans people, even ones who aren't autistic (or at least so high functioning as to not merit a diagnosis)
There was an article about it somewhere but I can't find it now. This is still a pretty fringe area of study and the USA seems to be shitcanning all further trans research for the future so I dunno when it will be that we get an answer

>>40452919
how does that make sense with reincarnation? Even if they don't call it a soul having your essence taken out of and put into another vessel seems pretty soul-like

>>508613685
isn't that more to do with transshipment than anything else

>>211862073
I know I shouldn't even give a (You) but literally how is a country that is 1/5th arab an ethnostate
>>211862258
they've walked away from that deal like multiple times because Le Zionist Entity wouldn't agree to dissolve itself
for the record I'm still in favor of them living in dignity just not as a proxy state for Iran

What is girlmoding, really? The usual definition is that girlmoding is going through effort to appear as female. This usually includes dressing up in female clothing and/or make up.
Here comes the issue though. Women look like women without makeup and in male clothes. Doesn't matter. Bald, with a fake beard, in their boyfriend's t-shirt, and so on.
>Fiction: You can look female if you're not a passoid
>Fact: You still look male in your girlmode if you you're a twinkhon or worse
This is why I also believe that passoids cannot boy- or manmode. At best (or worst, depending on how you see it) they look like normal women dressing quite plainly.
I'm not trying to redefine terminology here, but we have to examine what really counts as 'girlmode'. It is my personal belief that non-passing girlmoders are still technically boymoding.

Say you're a trans woman and you want a girlfriend people go "okay yeah sure, fine jeep"
Say you're a trans woman and want a butch on T, and everyone loses their minds and calls you all sorts of things, saying all kinds of things like "aren't you just being straight with extra steps" and "okay so you're faketrans"
Why is this? Transbians especially have a problem when I voice this opinion.

Should I feel bad about not having too much delineation of preference between FtMs and butchs/mascs on T? Like I think they both can be hot but I feel like some mind find this attitude disrespectful of their identity

>>40034978
>>40035002
>If I were a guy I would be better than 90% of men. I would be the perfect boyfriend
Literally me. It's so stupidly easy to be a good boyfriend, if I didn't have gender dysphoria I would detrans just to be some girls boyfriend. It's like the simple hurdle of "being nice to women and not making fun of them" trips 90% of guys and they fall face first into being derisive about anything associated with women.