>>718342051
>How can you skinwalk random reaction images? That's what they are, right? Not avatars?
Thats the funniest thing, the lala avatarfag defender would always argue that it's okay because they're just "reaction images" and therefore not breaking the rules, but then when somebody uses their images to impersonate them its suddenly skinwalking. If they're just reaction images how can one be skinwalking them? They don't own the images, anyone here can use them for anything. Than he tries to argue that the person impersonating them deserves to be banned, despite "impersonating an avatarfag" nor being against the rules. Meanwhile avatarfagging IS against the rules yet he thinks it's not ban worthy.