>>213492085
>These are exceptions to a rule I can't establish
You can, but then you get people like Wes Craven. Don't get me wrong, he was an entertaining dude and I love him, but three Screams in four years? Christ.
Speaking of which, even he had the sense to wait a decade before personally revisiting A Nightmare on Elm Street, and it worked.
All I'm saying is get your fuckin' knickers out of their twist. There isn't one right or wrong way to approach filmmaking, and any potential solution to your imaginary problem is not to just go full throttle.
>>213492105
Thanks for the fix.