>>509751384
My speculation is it isn't even necessarily about winning optics at this point on purpose. It's probably actual state backed shilling in an effort to psychologically prime people for full fledged NATO involvement. I don't know if it's some retarded EU group or maybe Ukrainians themselves.
Wars were not always sadistic and full of war crimes, they used to be fought with a sense of honor. It's a common shill tactic like
>>509751442 to make you think the opposite though, that your lack of mindless support for this barbarism means you're actually the retarded shitskin, when in reality most people are naturally adverse to this even in war time. It's shilling psychology 101.