>>529953330
>this is no different than trying to argue that Sonic stopping Eggman is infringing on Eggman's "freedom".
Well, you could make the argument that Eggman's freedom infringes on other people's freedom. So Sonic infringing on his freedom actually protects the freedom of more people.
>Framing that as "infringing on their freedom" is inherently flawed
What makes it inherently flawed? You have not explained that. Just saying that isn't an argument, Sparky.
Oooh, you're getting nervous, aren't you? Have I finally done it? Have I finally destroyed you?
>He'd save the guy, and move on.
Aahhhh... So Sonic only values freedom if it's freedom to do shit he likes. Sounds a bit like something a certain Senator from a certain game would do.