>>510157027
You didnt make any "actual points". You didnt cite any data, you didnt use anything objective for measurement, and you didnt really read what I said. You didnt say anything about gender dysphoria, how it's measured, or how you assess whether which treatment is applicable. You said they can do whatever they want.
>what more do you expect from the process that really is simplified to a grown adult consenting to something that only affects themselves?
A minimal baseline of scientific competency, with assessments, using clear numbers, benchmarks, courses of escalting treatment, and clear outcome probabilities. Like you have for every other medical procedure.
>i didnt say that
Yup, you did. And I quote: "no one has done more research on the outcome of transgender surgeries than trans people themselves".
>multiple pre-surgical appointments/consults are done before any trans surgeries occur, including ones that arent even specific to gentials like top surgery and ffs. tattoos you can get walk-ins done.
But if you want to do something harmful, like peirce your anus closed or get a cock drawn on your face, they'll say no. That's far more rigor than you suggested if the trans person can just decide to do whatever they want you dumbass.
>this surgical procedure has already existed for women dealing with breast cancer, its not some new science/ untested procedure, stop letting your subjective opinions affect your outlook on everything.
My fucking sides. Reread that. Read it again. An emergency treatment for a rapidly spreading disease that will certainly kill you is being compared to feeling unsatisfied. Not feeling euphoric.
