>>64093576
>>64091435
>canards
>vertical fins
>top intakes
Copying China out of everyone. The US is running out of ideas. Sad

>>64084193
>made prototype
>too stupid to make it operational
>somehow this is good acshually!
very sad and impressive

>>64077013
>>64077020
it's in perfect control all the time due to the honest engine and the canards. Geniuses always operate at the edge of equilibrium.
The reason the f-x plane looks "stable" is because of the dishonest engines.
Fact the engine is still dishonest after all these years and they have to add canards.
Sad. Nothing is going to change due to chuds like you. Face the reality. Be honest.

>>64067901
maybe if they add another canards, it will fly faster?
>b2
>6th gen btw
>4 engines btw
>sub-sonic
sad.

>>64015626
>Deny existence, blow everyone's minds when it debuts
kek

>>63969581
update me on the lore of "500"

anyway, the US always learn from the best. That was how our nation became great!

And you will never be american.

>>63961863
just like the US space program that was kickstarted by stealing Soviet design, and the nuke program and the air force that were created on the back of anonymous Chinese scientists, the AUS (America United States) have to wait for either Russia or China to come up with something for them to copy.

Notice how after the B-2 and F22 everything they made has been shitshows after shitshows. That is because the end of the cold wars resulting in mass repatriation of Chinese and Russian scientists to their motherlands. Also, the American drank their own coolaid and started to replace Chinese and Soviet born scientists with American born and Pajeets and DEI.
Picrel

>fins
japs trying to steal chinese culture AGAIN

memes aside, why do every other "6th gen" official designs have either vertical fins or canards?
Did the reliance on fake-thrust engines neuter the ability of the West to make/engineer sound aerodynamic designs?
Discuss seriously please.
>inb4 b2
reminder
>4 engines
>subsonic
>not a fighter
>maneuverability of a brick