>>509732301
>>509733202
Then for the russian part
>language
again Finns never had to learn swedish so it's a moot point.
>give you your own....
russia didn't give Finns anything. "Autonomy" meant autonomy from russian law, that means we kept swedish law. after 1809 literally NOTHING changed from a legal pov. One can say that after 1809 there were TWO swedens in existence. (two exact replica state entities except for different names and geography and monarch)
regarding the government, there was no effective finnish government for almost 50 years, since after 1809 no diet was called until 1863. So during that time even the misunderstood version of "autonomy" wasn't even real. And in practical terms autonomy decreased since no diet was called (during swedish era there were regular estate generals and Finns always participated)
Then Alexander II did start implementing reforms so autonomy could actually be realized but then you guys murdered him and walked everything back. If this hadn't happened there would be some point in this image but the strawman image completely disregards everything that happened after Alexander IIs reign. The reaction is not appropriate for Alexander II but it IS appropriate for Nicholas II but the strawman mixes them together into a false image.