>>724994410
It wasn't dumbed down for retarded cubies.
4chan Search
16 results for "188c40696e3b82a1b57b1e5a3fcf3ce6"
>>724839840
What was with the shitcube and ruining beloved classics? Cubies are the original demake slop eaters
What was with the shitcube and ruining beloved classics? Cubies are the original demake slop eaters
>>724684593
It's not even a contest, the DEmake is dogshit only cubie zoomers who only had a shitcube would defend.
It's not even a contest, the DEmake is dogshit only cubie zoomers who only had a shitcube would defend.
>cubies have now been defiling Resident Evil 1 with their braindead shitcube remake for over 20 years now
>>723332975
>REmake 1 has everything the OG had and more all improved and polished to mirror sheen
lol
>REmake 1 has everything the OG had and more all improved and polished to mirror sheen
lol
>>720731210
-me.
Crimson Heads were a great addition, and the fact that DEmake 2-4 didn't have a similar system, eventhough it was planned, is just one of the many, many sins of those clusterfucks.
>>720731272
REmake 1 already was a significant downgrade from the 1996 original.
Still THE definitive remake in history, and the game that started the boom in the first place.
-me.
Crimson Heads were a great addition, and the fact that DEmake 2-4 didn't have a similar system, eventhough it was planned, is just one of the many, many sins of those clusterfucks.
>>720731272
REmake 1 already was a significant downgrade from the 1996 original.
Still THE definitive remake in history, and the game that started the boom in the first place.
>>720087049
They should let RE1 rest. The shitcube already ruined its legacy with that horrible demake.
They should let RE1 rest. The shitcube already ruined its legacy with that horrible demake.
>>11983452
>best version of RE4
>can play the best version of RE1 so no need to buy a shitty demake
>since the PS2 isn't a barebones piece of shit that lacked backwards compatibility like the GameCube, it wasn't playing catch up in the 6th gen by eating the PS1's scraps and making players rebuy RE2 which the PS2 can already play
>Outbreak
What do you mean, it had every game and Outbreak mogs the mog out of 0.
>best version of RE4
>can play the best version of RE1 so no need to buy a shitty demake
>since the PS2 isn't a barebones piece of shit that lacked backwards compatibility like the GameCube, it wasn't playing catch up in the 6th gen by eating the PS1's scraps and making players rebuy RE2 which the PS2 can already play
>Outbreak
What do you mean, it had every game and Outbreak mogs the mog out of 0.
>the worst version of re4
>shitshine
>smelee
>luigi's 2 hour tech demo
>shit waker
>a dogshit remake of re1
>a dogshit remake of mgs that looks worse than mgs 2
not even replying to that cubie
>shitshine
>smelee
>luigi's 2 hour tech demo
>shit waker
>a dogshit remake of re1
>a dogshit remake of mgs that looks worse than mgs 2
not even replying to that cubie
>>718354896
Cut content demake slop. This doesn't even include all the scenes with Rebecca that got cut when they made it mandatory to meet her with Richard.
Cut content demake slop. This doesn't even include all the scenes with Rebecca that got cut when they made it mandatory to meet her with Richard.
>>717331056
>As someone who played REmake first and then RE1 I really don't get what people think is better about it than the remake
Oldfag here.
The REmake was designed as the "NG++" for the old time RE fans. It is designed to surprise and challenge experienced players, all while demonstrating the striking improvement in visual tech.
I dig the REmake a ton, but it has a number of sheer downgrades that make it less replayable IMO.
This includes everything from the base gameplay feeling more floaty and clunky (characters kinda float as if in slo-mo, bullet hits have next to no impact on enemies until they drop...), to the very early game being super linear and restrictive compared to the 1996 OG, which allows you to explore most of W. and E. sides 1st and 2nd floors right off the bat.
The cuts extend to late game as well, with a huge number of alternative scenes and ways of meeting certain main characters being simply removed. The ending itself is also diminished to a couple A/B choices during the game.
I also honestly believe REmake is a bit too easy, with the game providing too many Ink Ribbons + the emergency weapons allowing you to avoid a lot of damage altogether.
But once again, I must stress that I adore REmake, and it is the type of re-make everyone has asked for rest of the RE games (and literally any other "retro" classic) since 2002. It's just easier to do 1:1 comparisons with the OG game since both are now easily available and ultimately so close to each other on a surface level (gameplay, story, progression method).
>As someone who played REmake first and then RE1 I really don't get what people think is better about it than the remake
Oldfag here.
The REmake was designed as the "NG++" for the old time RE fans. It is designed to surprise and challenge experienced players, all while demonstrating the striking improvement in visual tech.
I dig the REmake a ton, but it has a number of sheer downgrades that make it less replayable IMO.
This includes everything from the base gameplay feeling more floaty and clunky (characters kinda float as if in slo-mo, bullet hits have next to no impact on enemies until they drop...), to the very early game being super linear and restrictive compared to the 1996 OG, which allows you to explore most of W. and E. sides 1st and 2nd floors right off the bat.
The cuts extend to late game as well, with a huge number of alternative scenes and ways of meeting certain main characters being simply removed. The ending itself is also diminished to a couple A/B choices during the game.
I also honestly believe REmake is a bit too easy, with the game providing too many Ink Ribbons + the emergency weapons allowing you to avoid a lot of damage altogether.
But once again, I must stress that I adore REmake, and it is the type of re-make everyone has asked for rest of the RE games (and literally any other "retro" classic) since 2002. It's just easier to do 1:1 comparisons with the OG game since both are now easily available and ultimately so close to each other on a surface level (gameplay, story, progression method).
>>716520131
The DEmake is only dick sucked by cubies because the shitcube didn’t have backwards compatibility and they only had the soulless ass demake to play.
The DEmake is only dick sucked by cubies because the shitcube didn’t have backwards compatibility and they only had the soulless ass demake to play.
>>716472902
kill yourself cubie. your shitty flopcube ruined the legacy of RE1 with its neutered soulless demake and turned the series into actionslop for more than a decade
kill yourself cubie. your shitty flopcube ruined the legacy of RE1 with its neutered soulless demake and turned the series into actionslop for more than a decade
>>716361949
>cubies are so starved for games, a shitty, phoned in, butchered, soulless full priced demake of RE1 is one of their best titles
lmfao. the best version of RE will always be the Director's Cut on PS2 with component cables. seethe and cope, faggot
>cubies are so starved for games, a shitty, phoned in, butchered, soulless full priced demake of RE1 is one of their best titles
lmfao. the best version of RE will always be the Director's Cut on PS2 with component cables. seethe and cope, faggot