>>106893718
>>106893736
>>106893748
It's an internet tradition at this point.
>people were shitting on xp and endorsing 2000 and 98 in 2001 and calling xp bloat and buggy and consumed 64 megs of ram while idle (2000 consumed like 30 and 98 a couple of single digit megs)
>later they were endorsing xp over "modern eye candy windows" because they were bloat (vista and 7 needed 2gb for the 32 bit version to run good)
>then they were endorsing 7 over 8 (8 was the superior os but the ui was ass)
>then they were endorsing 8.1 and 7 over 10 due to telemetry and forced updates (both are fair criticisms ngl) everyone was shitting on 10 in 2018
>now they are endorsing 10