>>17796888
check'em
>Roman, Piso (Stephen Robert Kuta) feat Gallus, Jay. Piso Christ: A Book of the New Classical Scholarship
"New classical scholarship”? More like new age fanfiction. Kuta’s a grifter riding Reuchlin’s coattails, claiming the Pisos were the masterminds behind every verse.
>but muh numerical codes in the texts prove it
What, like gematria for retards? Early Christians were getting fed to lions, not playing Sudoku with Roman aristocrats. The Church’s continuity (from Polycarp to Irenaeus) crushes this ahistorical drivel. Kuta’s “codes” are about as scholarly as a horoscope. Go back to >>>/x/.
>Atwill, Joseph. Caesar’s Messiah: The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus
Atwill’s the king of this tinfoil trash. Thinks Titus Flavius is the “real Jesus” because of some typological parallels.
>but Gospels mirror Flavian campaigns
Yeah, because typology was a Jewish thing, not a Roman fanfic template. Atwill’s “parallels” are so vague they’d fit any war. His timeline’s a mess. Gospels were circulating by 70 AD, before Titus was emperor. No serious historian, not even secular ones, touches this. It’s mythicist cope for people who think “research” means watching YouTube.
>tl;dr
You're a cocksucking faggot, OP. All fields.
