>>718996072
games are a luxury good, and a AAA game should be roughly 120$ if game prices matched inflation, but since games are even more expensive to develop now they should realistically be 180$
>>23071976
You know what, I can't even be arsed to reply to this properly. I hope the other Brit anon breaks what's left of your spirit tonight. I could prove it's not me, but where's the fun in that? Have fun cupcake. >I had you muted on kick for months the entire time and you just spammed shit about me nonstop and i never saw any of it
lol