>>64080430
>Damn, nice dodging giving any solid answer fuckstick
It didn't deserve one because it was a stupid question
>Again all I'm seeing is a term that exists to lump a bunch of disparate rifles in one category that makes little sense and only came into use long after the guns left service. I can perfectly comprehend what a Battle Rifle is, it doesn't make the definition not stupid. Until someone can articulate how an M1D is a battle rifle but a M76 isn't I'm going to continue to regard the term amd it's users as stupid
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>Being a passive aggressive bitch doesn't make you less retarded
I'm not being passive aggressive I'm just bored of even challenging your wilful ignorance. It really is crazy to me how the differentiation is as simple as the type of munition they fire and here you are making the stupidest arguments to try and complicate something so simple. The whole damn purpose of assault rifles was to bridge the gap between battle rifles and submachine guns. But "duhhh automatic rifle duhhhhhhhhh". I'm right you're wrong I know more than you that's all there is to this
