>>715389163
Well, my argument is that "people" who enjoy twintails are faggots, which was patently obvious. And by extension, that the character would be better without twintails. But "There's really nothing to defend against other than a surface-level base statement." does prove my point, since only a colossal fag would say that.
Of course, I didn't need you to demonstrate for me that you take it up the ass, I already knew that because of the twintail thing, but I do appreciate you proving my point anyway