>>106521364
I hate DEmakes/10
She also owes me a full Silent Hill playthrough.
4chan Search
29 results for "9e0fa0313f25e3e0b8ee2a1a36b0a57e"
>>723710789
Because they suck
Because they suck
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
You always lose something when you're making a derivative of an original
>>723434302
Demake is not even a good game
Demake is not even a good game
>>721074550
You don't need a half hour long video to realize that.
You don't need a half hour long video to realize that.
>>721074550
You don't need a half hour long video to realize that.
You don't need a half hour long video to realize that.
>>719778150
Nah
Nah
Upscalers, temporal AA and framegen are essentially all anti-thesis of their own intended use cases.
In layman's terms, if your base resolution and framerate are not high enough by default, both the upscalers, the TAA, and the frame-gen will look, run AND feel god-awful. And I am talking about some modest 1080p / 60fps no longer being "enough" to support those hacks; the real game logic will run at 1/2 or even 1/3rd of the perceived framerate, minus some extra 10-20% because of the whole processing of the fake frames, so unless you're already doing 60fps or more, you will notice the visible "Ping".
I personally first used framegen in the notoriously awful Silent Hill 2 UE5 de-make, because it runs like ass without it, and the devs idiotic decision to turn it into a "Dark Souls-lite" style action game meant that 30fps reeeally does not feel smooth.
With modified FSR3.5 set to Balanced + 2x FG, I was able to net locked "80" fps, but the input lag was VERY noticeable. Talking about visible .5 second delay before anything registered. I kinda learned to live with it, but it always felt like I was running in a hip-deep bog.
tl;dr: either you play very lightweight games, got an RTX5090 that can bruteforce modern shit at >120fps, or you're just blind + have never played a single SP game that requires precise movements and instant responsiveness.
In layman's terms, if your base resolution and framerate are not high enough by default, both the upscalers, the TAA, and the frame-gen will look, run AND feel god-awful. And I am talking about some modest 1080p / 60fps no longer being "enough" to support those hacks; the real game logic will run at 1/2 or even 1/3rd of the perceived framerate, minus some extra 10-20% because of the whole processing of the fake frames, so unless you're already doing 60fps or more, you will notice the visible "Ping".
I personally first used framegen in the notoriously awful Silent Hill 2 UE5 de-make, because it runs like ass without it, and the devs idiotic decision to turn it into a "Dark Souls-lite" style action game meant that 30fps reeeally does not feel smooth.
With modified FSR3.5 set to Balanced + 2x FG, I was able to net locked "80" fps, but the input lag was VERY noticeable. Talking about visible .5 second delay before anything registered. I kinda learned to live with it, but it always felt like I was running in a hip-deep bog.
tl;dr: either you play very lightweight games, got an RTX5090 that can bruteforce modern shit at >120fps, or you're just blind + have never played a single SP game that requires precise movements and instant responsiveness.
>>718535109
>Will it suck?
>RE4 remake was really good.
You have absolutely no basis to judge whether something sucks or not.
>Will it suck?
>RE4 remake was really good.
You have absolutely no basis to judge whether something sucks or not.
>>717278368
OP here, I meant the opposite.
OP here, I meant the opposite.
No
>>713385567
here you go zoomie, a tiktok so you can understand
here you go zoomie, a tiktok so you can understand
>>712782340
both are cancer, play the originals, not the remilks.
both are cancer, play the originals, not the remilks.
>>712723472
Original plays better too
Original plays better too