>>536803212
Radicals are the ones keeping IoM from ruin. so of course I will be playing the morally correct path
>"He who is not a Puritan in his youth has no heart; he who is still a Puritan in his maturity has no brain."

>>718874297
I get that but Inquisitors have the power to brand someone as a heretic and get them torture/executed on a whim if they suspect anything funny.
That's why people are freaked out when they show up, especially people in positions of power. So it makes sense that (You) and some of your companions are uncomfortable in his presence.

>>535214312
You also forgot to mention that both Iconoclast and Dogmatic alignment bonuses are OP broken compared too anything in Heretical
I also don't think it helps that devs are scared to punish players nowadays, good/heroic choices should not be rewarding mechanically or gameplay wise,stuff like removing access to shop,make boss fights harder or make the party/character weaker stat wise should be the norm for non-evil playthroughs. Roleplaying a good person should be difficult and the reward should mostly come from the heroic acts itself

I hope Radical choices in Dark Heresy are always statistically better than Puritan choices, stuff like better gear,permanent buffs or access to unique trader/shops. Would make roleplaying much more interesting

>>534345067
Only if they don't lose

>>533571652
puritan choices should have bad outcomes for companions and you the MC. Radical should be the only alignment that have a "good" ending and outcome

>>714690402
>sol brands her a heretic
>meanwhile jimbo says absolutely nothing about it, he only cares about the mirror and the world
Really makes me wonder

>>714617113
Our Lord Inquisitor is just too based and right to not like him

>>714207287
>Can someone explain why Calcazar is wrong?
I can't. There is honestly no reason to stop him, he is such an example of a "did nothing wrong" villain it actually kinda sucks in a way. Because even game struggles to come up with a reason why should you even bother follow him to stop his plans. Kinda like with Kreia in Kotor 2.
>Wouldn't a c'tan be able to close the great rift?
This would seemingly suck for all creatures with soul. This used to be a natural state of the galaxy anyway and Necrons almost managed to sever connection of galaxy from the Warp which is why those Pylons were there around the Eye of Terror.
However back in Old Ones time Warp didn't suck like it does now with Chaos Gods

>>529539369
I know some people in 40K community hates this, but I kind of wish that Nomos was canon, some insane inquisitor decided that humanity needed to level the playing field and thought having our own dragon shard was the play. Sure, Nomos gotta eat a few suns to sustain itself but that's a small price to pay

>>527559773
>unpopular opinions
Revealed companions look great
>hopes
That you can finish the game with minimal combat encounters if you play your hand right.
A Jimmy husband
>concerns
Not a concern but a certaintly - everything shitrok says is a lie

>>712743145
It's not. Dark Ages were ~2000 to ~2011. Every genre worth shit died there. Strategy games of all varieties were dead. cRPGs were dead. Stealth games were dead. Only thing that existed were godawful, linear brown and bloom shooters and action games, which were designed for fucking gamepads on top of this lol.
Ever since vidya got FAR better. Dead, proper genres were revived. Consoles lost to PCs, exclusives proved to be a mistake, AA devs started to live and experiment and there is far more variety in games in general. Even AAA shit got better. New IPs are being created constantly and turn out to be a massive successes out of nowhere. It's actually great now, only actual problem are political leanings of game creators.