>>509668199
>>509647293
>>509647692
>>509665550
Let me break it down since you guys don't understand basic math. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a random person of race to have more shared DNA than your own child. You fags always reduce dna to skin hair, eye, color when in fact human dna is extremely more complex than just phenotype markers.
Two different measurements:
1. Species-level similarity (comparing DNA sequences):
Any two humans: ~99.9% identical DNA sequences
Humans vs chimpanzees: ~99% identical DNA sequences
Humans vs bananas: ~50% identical DNA sequences
2. Inheritance-based relatedness (comparing which specific DNA segments you inherited):
Your biological child: ~50% of their DNA came directly from you
Your full sibling: ~50% of your DNA came from the same sources (same parents)Random human of same ancestry: ~0.1-0.5% of DNA segments trace to recent shared ancestors
Random human of different ancestry: ~0% DNA segments from recent shared ancestors