>backwards reasoning
an extremely powerful technique beginning with a contrived presupposition which conveniently isn't defended. combined with spamming, consensus cracking, and/or flooding and/or sliding, troublesome evidence can be made irrelephant
essentially,
>declare conclusion
>ignore challenges to premise
>repeat ad nauseum with or without bots
they aren't sending their best
>>509288190
it does seem that way
and it also seems like consensus crackers from 8 during 2018 midterms think they don't stand out