/sci/ - Science & Math

For what type of data can I use the empirical rule? What doesn't follow the empricial rule?

at what point does math become philosophy? is

I guess a long trip to Mars becomes a lot comfier now.

https://x.com/BanhmiBrieoche/status/1985375110086471919/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1985375110086471919¤tTweetUser=BanhmiBrieoche

When it is near the visual horizon line as observed from an elevated position.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAIWBTZn0jI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4ZpwC4GclI

Yet white people pretend this explosion is happening just meters away from the camera man.

I don't get it?
Do white people live on a very tiny sphere where the visual horizon line is very close?

If you watch this on something other than a phone, ie A computer or a TV you see:
1) Field
2)Treeline 1
3) Village
4) Treeline 2
5) Water
6) Land
7) Treeline 3
8) Water (another bunch of it)
9) Land
10) Treeline 4
11) Explosion
12) Visual horizon line right there near the explosion.

How can this be "close"
It looks like it's miles and miles away.

White people then say "the camera man would have been knocked over by the blast"
But he is when it shockwave hits him, many seconds later. He stumbles and is almost knocked down by it.

White people then say there is "no" shockwave,
when it is clearly visible as an instantanious mist that rolls out along the ENTIRE countryside from the epicenter of the blast.

White people then say that it's just a small amount of conventional explosives.
When it lights up the ENTIRE countryside like it's the morning,

How the fuck?
Then they call me brown.

> Tver Toropets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4OeKEHCuic


>>520229988
The shockwave for a nuclear blast initially travels much faster than the speed of sound.
So your calculation is incorrect.

Say we had the technology to manipulate objects at the nanolevel maybe using nanomachines or some other plot bullshit.
How good could you make rocket engines, fuel, computers etc?

>>>/b/942166092

theoretical basis of electrogravitic propulsion just dropped

Why have Harvard students gotten so much smarter over the past 50 years?

>NOOOO YOU HAVE TO LET US RESEARCH MATH THIS REALLY NEEDS MILLIONS OF DOLLARS
>AND LOOK AT ALL THE FEMALE PhDs RESEARCHING FAKE DISEASES THAT EXPLAIN AWAY THEIR OBESITY THAT IS ESSENTIAL TO PROGRESS_tm
>LOOK AT HOW HARD SHE IS SCIENCING!!!
Math has specialized into nonsense, nothing is applicable.
We physically can't even transfer a 1000th of the scientific knowledge generated each year. It's time to blow away the chaff
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLvO070E_dI

> Researchers have mathematically proven that the universe cannot be a computer simulation. Their paper in the Journal of Holography Applications in Physics shows that reality operates on principles beyond computation. Using Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, they argue that no algorithmic or computational system can fully describe the universe, because some truths, so called "Gödelian truths" require non algorithmic understanding, a form of reasoning that no computer or simulation can reproduce. Since all simulations are inherently algorithmic, and the fundamental nature of reality is non algorithmic, the researchers conclude that the universe cannot be, and could never be a simulation.
https://news.ok.ubc.ca/2025/10/30/ubco-study-debunks-the-idea-that-the-universe-is-a-computer-simulation/

whats the point of /sci/ if I can just ask questions to chatgpt?

if i made a machine that can suppress fusion and pointed it at the sun what would happen to the poor star?
would it just slowly turn into a huge gas giant?

>Indian origin MIT professor argues cow dung is good for you
>Western science is only slowly learning what ancient Hindus knew - health is not sterility
Thoughts?

Does energy equal mass times acceleration squared plus artificial intelligence?
Who is the main user of "AI"?

it do be like that

When it is near the visual horizon line as observed from an elevated position.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAIWBTZn0jI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4ZpwC4GclI

Yet white people pretend this explosion is happening just meters away from the camera man.

I don't get it?
Do white people live on a very tiny sphere where the visual horizon line is very close?

If you watch this on something other than a phone, ie A computer or a TV you see:
1) Field
2)Treeline 1
3) Village
4) Treeline 2
5) Water
6) Land
7) Treeline 3
8) Water (another bunch of it)
9) Land
10) Treeline 4
11) Explosion
12) Visual horizon line right there near the explosion.

How can this be "close"
It looks like it's miles and miles away.

White people then say "the camera man would have been knocked over by the blast"
But he is when it shockwave hits him, many seconds later. He stumbles and is almost knocked down by it.

White people then say there is "no" shockwave,
when it is clearly visible as an instantanious mist that rolls out along the ENTIRE countryside from the epicenter of the blast.

White people then say that it's just a small amount of conventional explosives.
When it lights up the ENTIRE countryside like it's the morning,

How the fuck?
Then they call me brown.

> Tver Toropets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4OeKEHCuic


>>520229988
The shockwave for a nuclear blast initially travels much faster than the speed of sound.
So your calculation is incorrect.

They are further away.

>normal
>regular

When it is near the visual horizon line as observed from an elevated position.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAIWBTZn0jI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4ZpwC4GclI

Yet white people pretend this explosion is happening just meters away from the camera man.

I don't get it?
Do white people live on a very tiny sphere where the visual horizon line is very close?

If you watch this on something other than a phone, ie A computer or a TV you see:
1) Field
2)Treeline 1
3) Village
4) Treeline 2
5) Water
6) Land
7) Treeline 3
8) Water (another bunch of it)
9) Land
10) Treeline 4
11) Explosion
12) Visual horizon line right there near the explosion.

How can this be "close"
It looks like it's miles and miles away.

White people then say "the camera man would have been knocked over by the blast"
But he is when it shockwave hits him, many seconds later. He stumbles and is almost knocked down by it.

White people then say there is "no" shockwave,
when it is clearly visible as an instantanious mist that rolls out along the ENTIRE countryside from the epicenter of the blast.

White people then say that it's just a small amount of conventional explosives.
When it lights up the ENTIRE countryside like it's the morning,

How the fuck?
Then they call me brown.

> Tver Toropets: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4OeKEHCuic


>>520229988
The shockwave for a nuclear blast initially travels much faster than the speed of sound.
So your calculation is incorrect.

They are further away.

Are any of you attached to any cool machine shops that let you work on more high tech shit? Little over 10 years in the trade and I'm bored. Former DoD manufacturing experience but it was all structural and just ended up feeling like any other job shop aside from getting to see it get bolted together and sent out for use.
>What do you consider cool?
Anything space related or used to kill people, possibly some combination of the two. I was considering getting a gig at SpaceX but all their machine shops are in California and the one "CNC Machinist" job at Starbase appears to have literally nothing to do with the trade according to the job description.

Also on the off chance one of you already works in the field, how goods the pay at a place that makes rocket components?

Orion sucks donkey dick - edition

previous >>16831714

A pop-science journalist known as James Douglas Boyd has recently spent a lot of time interacting with Mochizuki and others at RIMS working in anabelian geometry. He published his interviews with Mochizuki a few weeks ago.

However, esteemed Professor Mochizuki Shinichi is NOT AT ALL happy with the results, writing
>It is difficult for me to recall any time in my career as a mathematician when I experienced a comparable level of overt fraud/duplicity/charlatanism in a professional situation, and it has left me in a state of [math]\textit{deep shock}[/math].
https://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/IUT-report-2025-10.pdf
In particular, he claims the J.D. Boyd he interacted with was "nothing more than a cynical work of fiction" (see pic rel).

Mochizuki further emphasizes EMS Code of Practice (EMSCOP) and argues journalism/story-telling (and some preprints) lack the professional accountability apparatus of peer-reviewed mathematics. Boyd’s work violates prior assurances and democratic norms (rule of law, due process, burden of proof).
He then comments on the Scholze-Stix (SS) manuscript:
- The SS manuscript is unpublished, contains no precise statement or proof relating its simplified set-up to IUT
- SS declined further discussion after 2018; calls it a “mystery” why anyone asserts a logical relationship between their simplification and IUT
- SS explicitly did not contest IUT’s multiradial representation (IUT III, Thm 3.11); rather, they claimed no path to diophantine consequences.

Can this board count upwards along the number line?
Here goes:
>1

I don’t get how anyone thinks real “nothing” could exist. You can picture a void or black space, but that’s still something. If there was ever truly nothing, how could anything start? There’d be no space, no time, no potential for change. It just doesn’t add up

Scientifically speaking, how do you cure your depression?

/sci/ is this true?

Is nanomedicine feasible?
Will it be able to make us effectively immortal?

I'm sorry but I still don't believe it's real.
It took thirty years for a Tyrannosaurus to reach full size. You're telling me it had to compete with Tyrannosaurus clones its entire life and STILL reached full size?
What niche did Nanotyrannus fill that subadult Tyrannosaurus did not?
Do they really want to imagine a narrative for themselves off of a few bone fragments?

According to gay.i. the chances of a coin landing on heads 100 times in a row is as follows:
>The probability of flipping a coin and landing on heads 100 times in a row is extremely low, calculated as (1/2)^100, which is approximately 0.79 x 10^(-30).

How is this possible when the chances of landing on heads is about 50/50 on any given flip, including the 100th flip.

Please forgive any retardation in my post i did not pass high school, somebody please teach me.

We are going to save the sulfer today.. And you can see how I do it, Baryonic matter is the prize!

1. Sulfer and I have been linked.
2. Baryonic matter and you older generation guys are possibly linked.

The hypothesis is (weather we get to an experiment or not) that catalysts are being taken out by MK Ultra to affect people and I can beat em SAMEFAGING along to put the catalysts back.

Mine is Sulfer, you guys look to me about 1 thing, and it's (in the hypothesis today) not sulfer and might be nothing to do with me it's Baryonic matter. It's Baryonic matter (in the hypothesis) that you thought I was, and we give it a go too. We are going put our catalysts back and maybe explore options for when we lose a catalyst in future.

*live chemical reaction*

Can a samefags narrative do something?

/k/ /g/ and /pol/ will post images like this and say "see this lights up the sky too, thus toropets was not a nuke"

But that doesn't like up the sky like the morning sun from the visual horizon to your feet.

Toropets did, and for an extended period of time.
Just like upshot-knothole made everything the same golden colour, for the same amount of time.

Showing that both matched in black-body spectrum emissions. Suggesting both were the same tempreature.

Playing on a large TV it certaily looks such.
It's happening near or at the visual horizon line.
Can people on phones not see that?

That's not close.

Also then white people double down and say "the speed of sound is 340m/s, it must be close"

When nuclear blast waves travel at 1500m/s up to 3000m/s . When you point that out they say "no but sound doesn't" etc. "blast waves aren't sound" etc etc. So the linear algorithim isn't accurate. You have to take into consideration that for the first few moments it's going much faster than the speed of sound.

I hate to Twitterpost but isn't this completely wrong? In order for something to become cold, heat needs to be taken out of it. In the vacuum of space there's no medium through which the heat can be transported, so wouldn't an object which generates heat in space overheat very quickly?

How do you know that even though the future was like the past in the past, that the future will be like the past in the future? and what is your basis for knowing that?

Playing on a large TV it certaily looks such.
It's happening at the visual horizon line.
Can people on phones not see that?

That's not close.

Also then white people double down and say "the speed of sound is 340m/s, it must be close"

When nuclear blast waves travel at 1500m/s up to 3000m/s . When you point that out they say "no but sound doesn't" etc. "blast waves aren't sound" etc etc. So the linear algorithim isn't accurate. You have to take into consideration that for the first few moments it's going much faster than the speed of sound.

Are those things actually real or just smoke and mirrors? What's the use of them? How do they work? How can something be in both states? Pictures of quantum computers i see look like on purpose designed by sci fi artist to make it look weird

and other assored globohomo science enjoyers

What's the BMI and fat% of the average high iq adult?

Maybe in a country where the average person isnt obese by default.

PhDs open so many doors in life, it's like a complete cheat code. There's so many things you cannot do without a PhD.

Post whenever

>our equations for gravity do not work
>perhaps our equations are wrong?
>nah they cant be, it must be le spooky dark matter!!

defend this bullshit

thoughts on modern science? can it be fixed?
>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/stan.12241

A biologist allegedly put hundreds of rats in a "rat utopia" and watched them descend into overpopulation, mass cannibalism and infertility through social dysfunction, but we only have his papers to go on as proof they really happened. There is no account of his funding, location or movements for the time period so for all we know he wrote up a fiction story as a hoax in his garage.
Is there any evidence that the events his paper describes were real?

What if quantum fluctuations are just compression artifacts of the simulator?
What if quantization itself is just the sim’s resolution limit?
If we really lived in a simulation, why would the dev waste so much memory on an infinite universe we’ll never see, instead of just making a smaller one with enough RAM left for deterministic physics at the microscopic level?

why is science so boring now?

we have millions of universes and science only knows of one