>>717373034
>Any officer of intelligence service of a country where "banking" is located, who can just order to shot every clerk in a head
So people that work for the government who they heavily invest in as well as lobby heavily for certain policies and agendas would be taken out by the people who they effectively fund? Again you’re not showing any hard evidence and instead are making claims that don’t hold up against basic scrutiny.
>Consequently, anyone above that officer in either explicit or secret society based chain of command
So the other people who they directly fund?
>Again, retard. Real life is not a video game. Money do not directly convert into force that influences physical world on demand
It absolutely does given you can easily buy out a politician and make them do what you want since campaigning and other things need money.
>Why?
So you don’t know why some major investor and or owner of most of the national currency as well as the major bank in which it is tied to dying and leaving it effectively a ship without a crew would not cause major consequences? Inflation, deflation, so much shit could occur. It would be utter chaos. Like I said most of the financial sector would collapse. Why are you arguing this if you don’t understand it? What is causing this level of fervor?
