>>105607540
Don't argue with word predictors, that will lead them to produce bad code, as your angry messages imply it statistically should. Start a new chat and ask it to fix the code "you"(it) wrote, or simply modify the original prompt and regenerate the response. You should always compliment what it makes or says to skew the distribution of possible words toward good outputs. Obviously it will still fuck up and be retarded because it's a word generator and can only at best pretend to reason by brainstorming reasoning steps it read, but kissing its ass helps a lot.