>>63831082
It's the year 2025 of our Lord, and you have instant access to all the information on the world in the palm of your hand, yet you still sit here sharing your childish misunderstandings of "how things are" as if they are facts for others to believe.
Here is one of the very first search results (of many) that says you're wrong. I'm sure you won't believe just this one though, but unfortunately for you, it's all I'll bothering sharing with you.
https://www.carrferrell.com/what-if-someone-uses-my-patented-invention-without-my-permission/
The two paths ahead of you now are:
>A) You want to accurately understand US patent law so you DYOR and within minutes understand that US patent law stipulates that individuals are infringing on a protected patent, even if what they're making is for personal use.
>B) You want to continue having a childish misunderstanding of US patent law so you can parrot your false head canon anonymously online, deluding yourself that by doing so you can remain "right" and somehow save face. You won't spend 5 minutes to DYOR.
Further more, to really expose the error of your mind, please share with everyone the "explicit" part of US patent law that says people can infringe on someone's patent so long as they aren't making money. I just talked down to you like a idiot bastard child; surely you want to put me in my place and prove me wrong, no?