>>724963281
>Being average is still being better than over 90% of all of /v/
FGC normies are bottom of the barrel, so if anything they'd be right at home in this shithole.
4chan Search
28 results for "2337b4f9a9fda5db01a2cd210e1ddf1c"
>>723847824
We're fucked.
We're fucked.
>>941499067
We're fucked.
We're fucked.
>>719993769
>No need they'll stop on their own once they run out of money.
So when's that gonna happen? In 60 years? in 9000 years?
We're still waiting anon, because it ain't happening this year from the looks of it.
>Yeah, it's called debt.
Nah, it's called growth.
>Sure, if you're retarded I can see that.
Go on then and provide a single statistical or economic showcase of the video game industry value going down.
You can't, because it's facing growth just like other industries, even book publishing.
That being said, book publishing going up means less time to give to shitty video game producers, which again supports the fact that the entertainment industry is oversaturated, and the consumers have all the power over creators and distributors to dictate terms.
>>719993943
>You clearly have because you cited unemployment instead of workforce labor participation numbers.
Both of which don't change the fact that both keep spending money on video games and general entertainment.
>I'm not part of you retarded little argument
You are, video game industry value keeps going up, while shit studios and looney troon devs keep flopping. Oversaturation has given customers power over the industry, creators and corps no longer dictate it due to overdiversification of competitors.
This fact, the topic of the thread, still stands without you having provided any proof to the opposite.
>Earlier in this thread you posted a projected snippet
I provided a snipped that provided both projections and real time growth, the projections for 2023 and 2024 were met.
>we're entering a recession and that always leads
Which has nothing to do with the video game market being oversaturated currently, having growth value currently, and therefore consumers benefitting while croposlops and indie devs have to battle for their limited attention because gamers, consumers, have the power over them now.
You've tried to deflect in every way possible, yet the original stance still stands as fact it seems.
>No need they'll stop on their own once they run out of money.
So when's that gonna happen? In 60 years? in 9000 years?
We're still waiting anon, because it ain't happening this year from the looks of it.
>Yeah, it's called debt.
Nah, it's called growth.
>Sure, if you're retarded I can see that.
Go on then and provide a single statistical or economic showcase of the video game industry value going down.
You can't, because it's facing growth just like other industries, even book publishing.
That being said, book publishing going up means less time to give to shitty video game producers, which again supports the fact that the entertainment industry is oversaturated, and the consumers have all the power over creators and distributors to dictate terms.
>>719993943
>You clearly have because you cited unemployment instead of workforce labor participation numbers.
Both of which don't change the fact that both keep spending money on video games and general entertainment.
>I'm not part of you retarded little argument
You are, video game industry value keeps going up, while shit studios and looney troon devs keep flopping. Oversaturation has given customers power over the industry, creators and corps no longer dictate it due to overdiversification of competitors.
This fact, the topic of the thread, still stands without you having provided any proof to the opposite.
>Earlier in this thread you posted a projected snippet
I provided a snipped that provided both projections and real time growth, the projections for 2023 and 2024 were met.
>we're entering a recession and that always leads
Which has nothing to do with the video game market being oversaturated currently, having growth value currently, and therefore consumers benefitting while croposlops and indie devs have to battle for their limited attention because gamers, consumers, have the power over them now.
You've tried to deflect in every way possible, yet the original stance still stands as fact it seems.
>>719785384
>if anti-woke faggots played and posted about this apparent 'lifetime's worth of video games'
So wait, you're mad that people are too busy playing games that are not trannoid and corpotranny slop to pay attention to your products?
Yeah, that's the point. You can't sell shit if you can't monopolise someone's attention span, someone's limited time, and someone's limited wallet.
When there's an oversaturated industry, the drug dealer's value is depleted and deflated. This is currency deflation 101.
I understand that it makes you lot troons and AAA corps butthurt. You spend your days whining about grifters because the average person would rather waste their time in any of the other 9000 ways than on your looney troon corporate goyslop.
That means you can't make money, yet you feel some kind of entitlement to it. So you behave like a rapist and engage in these mental manipulatory and emotionally exploitative games to insult consumers and tell them they should be stupider and wasteful to their own detriment. It's narrative shifting bullshit to distract from an entire hobby's customerbase realizing (which they did) that they have control due to oversaturation, and that you can't gaslight them into giving you money for slop.
Let's not beat around the bush. This is a game of self-interest. Troons have self-interest to be seen and get money; but 15 years have passed and nobody's biting the bait because the fish have the self-interest to survive and not be eaten. You failed basic conflict theory.
>if anti-woke faggots played and posted about this apparent 'lifetime's worth of video games'
So wait, you're mad that people are too busy playing games that are not trannoid and corpotranny slop to pay attention to your products?
Yeah, that's the point. You can't sell shit if you can't monopolise someone's attention span, someone's limited time, and someone's limited wallet.
When there's an oversaturated industry, the drug dealer's value is depleted and deflated. This is currency deflation 101.
I understand that it makes you lot troons and AAA corps butthurt. You spend your days whining about grifters because the average person would rather waste their time in any of the other 9000 ways than on your looney troon corporate goyslop.
That means you can't make money, yet you feel some kind of entitlement to it. So you behave like a rapist and engage in these mental manipulatory and emotionally exploitative games to insult consumers and tell them they should be stupider and wasteful to their own detriment. It's narrative shifting bullshit to distract from an entire hobby's customerbase realizing (which they did) that they have control due to oversaturation, and that you can't gaslight them into giving you money for slop.
Let's not beat around the bush. This is a game of self-interest. Troons have self-interest to be seen and get money; but 15 years have passed and nobody's biting the bait because the fish have the self-interest to survive and not be eaten. You failed basic conflict theory.
>>281349652
kek
kek
>>717308724
African Nogs evolved next to it for millions of years and never traveled there, LMAO.
They are descendants of SEAnigs.
African Nogs evolved next to it for millions of years and never traveled there, LMAO.
They are descendants of SEAnigs.
>>717270918
>But you can see that the players spiked hard in a postiive way for tranny bridget
So you're saying Bridget troonshit was trendchasing, and not an actual fanbase spike, and like any superficial trend it died out because troons don't keep to anything for long, or live for long for that matter, so now the game died after the long-term fans were driven out by a temporary trend-seeking surge which was never fated to hold on.
How many times must we see this same phenomena unfold for the past 15 years before brainless retards like yourself stop trying to gaslight the same shitty non-arguments over and over again?
Oh look, MTG is gonna make a K-Pop Demon Shit deck to YET AGAIN artificially and inorganically attempt to conjure a female audience out of thin air; the result will be a surge in K-pop only deck sales as shelf dust-piling gimmicks, and but the actual game population will remain crippled, and more long-term fans will be driven off by the cringe, leading to yet another long-term shitter shatter just like what happened with D&D 5th Edition.
There should be a name for such mental illness you hold, in combo with short memory.
>But you can see that the players spiked hard in a postiive way for tranny bridget
So you're saying Bridget troonshit was trendchasing, and not an actual fanbase spike, and like any superficial trend it died out because troons don't keep to anything for long, or live for long for that matter, so now the game died after the long-term fans were driven out by a temporary trend-seeking surge which was never fated to hold on.
How many times must we see this same phenomena unfold for the past 15 years before brainless retards like yourself stop trying to gaslight the same shitty non-arguments over and over again?
Oh look, MTG is gonna make a K-Pop Demon Shit deck to YET AGAIN artificially and inorganically attempt to conjure a female audience out of thin air; the result will be a surge in K-pop only deck sales as shelf dust-piling gimmicks, and but the actual game population will remain crippled, and more long-term fans will be driven off by the cringe, leading to yet another long-term shitter shatter just like what happened with D&D 5th Edition.
There should be a name for such mental illness you hold, in combo with short memory.
>>511372939
LMFAO
LMFAO
>>532490594
lmao
lmao
>>511109397
What is that fucking video. Lmfao
What is that fucking video. Lmfao
>>529297749
jeets have low standards lmao
jeets have low standards lmao
>>712452683
NO WRONGTHINK ALLOWED
NO WRONGTHINK ALLOWED