>>512145215
>You'll have 50% boomers and 15% working adults all working just to feed them
that statement makes sense, but at the same time. hasnt our work efficiency doubled/tripled/gorillupled since the 80s or so? one would think that keeping the boomers on life support shoulnt be impossible if we were able to support the elderly in earlier times when our work was so "inefficient". am i totally wrong here?